Sociopathy or not, not gonna lie, I do agree on a lot of things he's said.
I've noticed religion or philosophical differences in general are the cause of most conflicts in the world; people believe themselves to be "superior" and harm those who aren't -- sinners, blasphemers -- because they contaminate the world with evil and degeneracy.
Republicans are probably the most outwardly racist, sexist, and incredibly shit towards people with mental health problems in general. They're generally very open about letting the weak rot, for a lack of a better description. I generally treat those statements as edgy jokes, but sometimes they end up being serious.
Liberals/Democrats/The Left are completely useless and docile -- they preach many ideas, of which stuff like free education (why the FUCK do we have to pay to better ourselves, ESPECIALLY if, in its irony, a lack of it makes us WORSE and stagnates our growth, thus making us really incompetent workers (then again, that comes with its benefits to those in control)) are very valuable, but have done jack shit regarding it.
The system as a whole is basically fucked, but it does have a chance at improving. I've given up on it because from what I see, it's downhill from here, due to both inaction and those currently in power are basically installing laws which will fuck us over as time goes by, but I don't deny the possibility that it could change.
Though honestly, given how the guys in power sometimes like to make people commit suicide out of nowhere and other fun things so it stays on its current trajectory, I have zero hope unless there is a violent revolution and someone who gives a shit takes power and fixes everything regardless of the public's will. Might be how a dictator talks, but honestly, it's either what we have now and are heading towards, or whoever has and will take the opportunity who rules the nation.
Of which, I also agree the public holds beliefs which are outdated and detrimental.
The amount of times I've heard "everyone has a little autism in them" while they can look people in the eyes without anxiety building up, nor have trouble hearing shit (while giving flak to people who do), among other things, is among one of very many things that prove the public has no fucking clue what mental health is, yet people not only pretend to know what it is, but also give shit to those who are experiencing symptoms of a mental illness, not just with aspergers/autism, but those with schizophrenia (who are often more at risk than of risk on how hollywood portrays them) and others of the sort.
By all means, it certainly doesn't justify stupid and bad shit they do, but honestly that line has been more used as a cop-out to not give a shit about others nor the problem causing the issue rather than as a moral stance. Not that others have to care about everyone and their condition, but between pretending to be moral versus just being upfront, I find the former more irritating.
And yes, I can agree that on some level, the pure human is one which is selfish, egotistic, irresponsible, desire for attention, who lie that they aren't such things. If anything, it's apart of our biology -- our core instincts.
Maybe I shouldn't openly agree with him or shrug off the fact he blackmails people, regardless of what they did, but I mean.
He's pretty straight-forward and honest about what he thinks, and what he thinks is backed up by reasoning and lack of hypocrisy.
Can't help but respect that.
I disagree on the nuances, but I mean, yeah, world's shit.
Some bitch stole money from charity and she got blackmailed to do a blowjob for it.
Dunno if she really needed to steal from a charity because she was desperate, but I mean, if she could fork over $1000, I doubt she was suffering from enough financial issues to warrant stealing from a charity. Disproportionate retribution maybe, could've been solved more peacefully maybe, but at least karma hit its target.
Not that she sounded like a pleasant person to begin with for mocking other peoples' interests and peaceful fun, let alone playing a moral high ground because they were athiests.
Why the fuck do people who need a book written about a few millennia ago to tell them what's right or wrong get to judge others on their morality, especially if said book doesn't mind slavery or child sex slaves, especially if the only reason why they're being "good" is so they don't suffer eternal suffering in purgatory rather than a genuine desire to want the world to be a better place, especially if said beliefs throughout history has led to so many massacres throughout history?
By all means, I do not give two shits what you put your faith in, because hell, maybe it gets you through the day.
I too believe in an equally, if not more ridiculous notion than an invisible man in the sky -- that all of humanity, sometime in the future, truly can set aside their differences, and love and peace will thrive in the world for an eternity.
But boy, when the fuckers start chuckling to themselves about how someone "sinned" and how they oughta follow the bible or some shit, I think they should be burned on a stake just like the witches they hunted in the past, just so they know the pain which they want to perpetuate.
That being said, I'm a rather huge hypocrite, so I doubt we'd get along.
I actually do not mind being remotely racist, sexist, and all the like, just to be offensive towards the people who honestly deserve it.
I don't personally think all black people are savages, women are sex-money whores, gays are rapists, and trannies child groomers, but I'll gladly play to it if I notice there's no point in a discussion, or if said "discussion" is more of a pretense for someone spilling their shit ideas and insulting anyone who disagrees with it.
Because at the end of the day, I know the statistics don't define the person in front of me. If the person in front of me is kind, nice, isn't a shithead, then why should I assume or treat them as one because statistics say others who share similar traits are asstwats?
I wouldn't promote any laws which would criminalize being said group, but boy sometimes I think segregation might be for the best whenever I see retards online, and I genuinely can't tell if that's good or not anymore.
I also like to preach objective morality, but I rarely follow it, since I neither have the patience for it, and honestly, why the fuck bother trying to argue the fact I'm human/not subhuman to a bunch of retarded brats online with no parental supervision who honestly deserve to get raped, tortured, and killed because by all laws of the universe, god, spirits, magic, metaphysics, and whatever other bullshit that may or may not exist, I do not see them as being anything more useful to anyone or anything, even themselves, as nothing more but living dolls and organ farms because they're actually braindead enough to think they know shit when their "knowledge" comprises of using Wolfram Alpha to do all the math homework for them without ever learning to problem solve and use logical reasoning, SparkNotes to do all their English assignments without ever learning how to critically analyze and think about something, and so on, especially when the little shits think to themselves that a fucking 14 year old is a pedophile for liking lolicon, that anyone under 5'7 is minor-coded, and that wanking it off to drawings is actually morally significant but enjoying murdering video game characters in GTA V "we're just doing it to progress through the game, we totally aren't enjoying it" isn't?
By all fucking means, I do not mind having a conversation about anything and everything, because it's stimulating to think and consider various ideas and concepts, and that's essentially the core of human conversation, except said topics are mundane like the weather, but boy no one likes to think or pose challenges anymore, with moreso just flinging dogshit at each other because the funny internet guy did it and it was funny and cool and shit.
And boy I really can't call myself a good person because I actually cannot see those shits as nothing of worth, and I genuinely believe that it would actually be in their benefit to be killed because they are just that fucking disgraceful to all that humanity has built itself upon.
I'll still say what I think would be an optimal path to what makes everyone, even the stupid people, happy, and benefits all, but if I have to make a sacrifice, some people make it easy to choose themselves as tribute, and I'm not going to give anyone shit for not being anything but perfect in regards to that, because why the fuck.
Honestly, if I were more fit, more proactive in social life, and had some massive balls, I'd probably do the same and ruin a couple of faggots' lives.
I'd 100% blackmail a bitch and get myself a blowjob.