hahaha I'm sorry but I'm compelled to respond, I'm that kind of retard lol
Then I'll give my best spiel
wait, at least I always take all the bullshit very seriously, I usually don't open debates on twitter because I don't want to lose my account fighting against people who are not worth reasoning with, but here it's another story.
so if you are going to leave at least give me time to answer you.
If you are really interested in discussing it, of course
I'm sorry but my english is not very good and sometimes I don't understand things well, thank you for simplifying
for this I have the question
exactly why is it wrong? could you answer this?
and not, saying that it is the image of a child is wrong is not an answer, because in the end they are fictitious children drawn that do not resemble the real ones so there is absolutely no one that gets hurt in this process, so I still can not see where the problem is.
bro, but please, this is not an opinion thing, let's be open minded, it's science, it's like people who say the earth is flat and hide behind saying ''it's my opinion and you have to respect it'' lol to excuse themselves that their opinion is silly and anti-science, plus why give your opinion in the first place if you literally say you don't care to listen to others.
It's fine that it's your opinion but you have to realize that you're just making a fool of yourself and you can't be offended when people tell you what you're clearly showing yourself to be.
also wtf, opinion is that I say ''I don't like lolis because for me they look like children and I am not interested in that kind of taste``.
but to say that everyone who likes lolis that not have tits are pedophiles is not just an opinion, how do you expect people not to be offended by that lol.
everybody can have an opinion, but in the same way everybody should be aware of what kind of opinions we can have and when an opinion stops being just that and becomes directly something offensive or harmful or a meaningless prejudice.
this is where people who think like you get very confused.
if you go to a psychologist just because you are attracted to lolis' drawings, then you are wasting your money.
because it is important to know when to differentiate a pathological disorder from just a sexual attraction, which although people find it hard to admit is much more common than they think.
to put ourselves in context we will use something that falls within the
Chronophilia and compare to see how there is much prejudice and ignorance behind this whole subject.
if a person is attracted to an elderly person, should he/she seek professional help? [
Gerontophilia]
if a person is attracted to teenagers or young ppl, should he/she seek professional help? [
ephebophilia]
in fact if we continue we will realize that there are paraphilias identified for all age ranges, so following your logic all the people on the planet should be going to therapy lol
that's why we have to differentiate when an
paraphilia is in fact a mental disorder.
in fact it's funny because of all the chronophilias the only one included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is pedophilia, but if you know about it you realize that there is no difference between this and other paraphilias lol
now it is important to determine that in order to be considered a
mental disorder there must be a series of noticeable symptoms that affect the life and well being of the patient, these psychiatric symptoms can be various [the most common, anguish, depression, or in this case we are talking about can be seen as an intense and uncontrollable desire] but they are indicative that a disorder is present and that treatment is needed, in the same way as with a physical illness, after all, if a person is attracted to lolis, but does not affect anyone, is aware of what he is doing, does not result in symptoms and is in control of his desires, then I don't see what the problem is and it would be questionable whether he really has a mental disorder, so if he goes to therapy he would literally be wasting his time, since psychologists can only give tools to alleviate the symptoms of a [diagnosed] mental disorder and can do nothing more.
likewise this approach can be complex and not applicable to all cases, so it is very likely that a person who is attracted to girls is not necessarily attracted to boys and vice versa, so it would be quite questionable whether it applies to pedophilia in the first place. So these people who label lolicons as pedophiles are just jumping to conclusions without any basis.
So this can be summed up as:
1. a person who is attracted to children doesn't necessarily have to like loli.
2. a person who is attracted to lolis does not necessarily have to be attracted to children [much less reach an patological attraction which is very different and is what is most important to differentiate and what people like you do not differentiate].
3. pedophilia does not apply to all people who have ever been attracted to a child or have ever been aroused by a child for any reason.
3. pedophilia should not always be treated as a mental disorder [and I don't care what it says in the WHO manual these people are pathetic, as proof we only have to bear in mind that pedophilia is the only chronophilia that is included in the manual, although it does not differ in any way from the others].
4. and most importantly, pedophilia should never be treated as a prejudice problem, in the end it only causes more problems than it solves.
Also with so many people liking lolis I doubt there are really that many people with the mental illness lol and there is absolutely no indication of anything that would cause it, this alone sounds like a
5. Pedophilia [as a real mental disorder] is difficult to diagnose, and NO ONE should take such liberty without following proper procedures and diagnoses based on pseudoscientific or unfounded stupidities should not be taken for granted, because even if this may not seem like it, they cause many more problems than they believe.
Anyway, I don't know if you're going to read all this
but I think it is good to leave prejudices and see things in the correct way.
All this these prejudices are based on two very beautiful fallacies:
You like "children`s drawings", then you are a pedophile
and then
Pedophiles are bad and need urgent help
and few people are willing to reason outside of this lol
nobody thinks that the thing is really much more complex than this, that's why it is a fallacy.
In the end said like this, it is important to know that, even if it is proven that the lolicon are pedophiles, hypothetically, even so, I still do not see the problem lol