Discussion What are the patterns you find with people online claiming their bullshit to be right?

[Eventflow]

Let me say it first.
I think they have a pattern of saying "disgusting" "gross" and "sick" when they spot something that doesn't fit through their morality. Then when you don't agree with their opinion then they call you a "Pedophile" or "Pro-rapist", etc. since they think it destroys someone's argument completely. They visit Twitter/Reddit to find incorrect people and attack them whenever they get a chance. It's for their sense of moral superiority and ego - because whenever they feel worthless, they cope by thinking "At least I'm better than them".
They have so many insecurities and fears, and they 'defeat' them by expressing negative emotions to people they hate. They get sort of 'drunk' with justice and believe they can do anything as long as their views don't change. I have seen someone proudly boasting about driving someone to die, just because they had different views.
I don't really know if they care about being moral anymore, they automatically think something that offends them, is something terribly wrong.

 

[Migi]

People in general follow the mainstream narrative on everything. So when they for once get confronted with a different viewpoint that was taboo or in generally not publically accepted, they tend to revert to the same old talking point that the majority are against. This even account for the fact that sometimes they don't agree with the masses, yet they need to preserve face, so they just parrot the same thing over and over again.

There is a lot of hypocriticism in society that people are engrained with since they were younger, and they lack the logical ability to doubt that standard even if that so-called golden standard has failed over and over again.

On Twitter or any social media where a person it's pretending to be better than they really are, they are just doing it for the attention. Or divert from the many skeletons they have in their closet. I take it as a grain of salt really, because people are barely their honest selves on social media and if you want to talk to them in an honest way.

 

[PatioRama]

"Muh common sense" is a big one I notice.

Usually this is in the context of when people ask for evidence on their common narratives like normalization theory. They will say or basically imply they don't need any because its 'obvious' it works that way. Ofc, for one thing this stuff isn't as obvious as they like to claim, and second, 'common sense' doesn't make something inherently correct. I like to point to Flat Earthers who loved to use this argument to justify their belief.

Another one is any variation of ad populum. "Most people agree with X so X is correct" My 'favorite' variation of this is the "showing strangers fetish porn on your phone" thing that was popular a while back. The 'logic' here is that if most people you show this to find this porn morally wrong, it objectively is morally wrong. This disregards how doing this or talking about fetish shit out of the blue at work would basically be sexual harassment and naturally make people uncomfortable.

 

[Gun]

I'll just say my favorites: "Get help" and "you are sick". People in the internet now are apparently doctors or something because they can see have you psychiatric problems because you find that frog girl from MHA attracctive or because you don't care about loli content or because u said something way too polemic in most people's eyes, which is just using logic to taboo issues and calling out hypocrisy. I also love when they say that loli normalizes p.... but then throw the word "pedo" with no problem.

 

[PatioRama]

I also love when they say that loli normalizes p.... but then throw the word "pedo" with no problem.

I remember someone justifying the latter by pulling "kafka traps" as they're called. "Oh you're only upset with people throwing the term pedo around like candy because you're a pedo"

 

[ジエントＰ]

They are enemies, they are typically paid but a few are useful idiots. They come from Twitter. They come from reddit. They truly come from Utah data center or some poor schmuck from the pentagon for no real people believe in this bs. They tend to control public opinion online. Real G's don't follow, tru cap.

 

[maybe]

1. Deliberately incite argument with somebody you suspect isn't a brainwashed follower of the Church of the Current Year.
2. When they say something that isn't lockstep with Stephen Colbert, really drive in the aghast "wow, I can't even" indignation.
2a. Get your friends to dogpile in and respond the same way ad nauseam.

This is how dumb people with no critical thinking skills band together & make individuals they dislike seem like crazy (but more importantly unpopular) people. They know they can't out-argue the other person with things like evidence or reason so this is the next best thing. Humans are tribal animals as well (and usually fucking dumb) so it usually works.

 

[Cursed]

1. open a account twitter for fame
2. buy bots (like 1000 )
3. stay a shit statement , let bot like
nice job now people believe what you say is true and if you are lucky you can have ads shit for shit things

 

[PhantomXero1x]

says all men are trash
gets millions of likes
shills their "dead and obnoxious" youtube channel honestly
cycle repeats