As we all know already, Pikamee wanted to play Hogwarts Legacy, aka That One Game about That One Franchise made by That One Transphobe.
She was on a 3 month vacation before she announced it.
And as soon as she announced it, she was targeted with a massive amount of death threats, dehumanizing statements, and so on.
After that, she ended up being silent for several weeks.
Rumors started to float, which I was not paying much attention for, because I believed Pikamee would simply acknowledge that those people are not her fans, and that they're simple feral animals who seek attention the most.
Of course, in the fact of thousands of subhuman freaks telling you to kill yourself...
You'd have to have extraordinary mental health the level that would qualify you to become an astronaut to not be remotely bothered by a quarter of it.
Of course, there's people who are saddened by this fact.
However, what is the reaction of the bullies?
They're more concerned about being victims in this than acknowledging the victim who was dog-piled by them, justifying their actions, trying to scapegoat everyone as if Pikamee's graduation was a 4D chess moves by Nazi supremacists to defame the Trans community as evil, and so on.
Be glad I didn't include fucking Tumblr screenshots in this. It's even worse.
As expected from the birthplace of all the horrids of modern internet.
Oh yeah.
This is where I'm going say it outright: Get the rope.
Transsexuals are the most socially accepted and forgiven pedophiles, which have not only a history of grooming children, but openly advocate mutilating their bodies due to both either a poor understanding or conscious dismissal of modern health technology and surgery to make a false semblance of a genital, alongside using chemicals which can permanently stagnate the development and even permanently break their developing bodies.
The fact that people can look at this situation and worry MORE about the lives of trans people as a whole (it's obvious given how much they fucking have to mention it every single other sentence) shows very clearly what they are.
Oh yeah, I forgot about KiwiFarms.
They have their own threads documenting various fun things Troons have done to children. Kiwi Thread 1 || Kiwi Thread 2 || Kiwi Thread 3
I'll let others say what I've been saying for quite some time now.
Many a time have many artists have been harassed, other VTubers like Kyuotto and Taiga, by these people.
Many a time have people simply excused it as simple "misunderstandings" and "their heart was in the right place."
Many a time have retarded subhuman filth that pass themselves off as sentient and autonomous agree with dehumanization for the sake of stating every second someone ELSE is human.
I'm saying it again, more clearly: Troons and their defenders are pedophiles, who support child grooming, abuse, and sexual exploitation at schools, bathrooms, in broad daylight on the streets in parades, and at stage shows.
Those who can continuously excuse the level and consistency of harassment by these deformed freaks archived in so many Twitter threads, forums, Google Docs, YouTube videos, and so on...
Those who can still say, "Be the bigger person" while doing NOTHING to truly get rid of this problem, with the only true explanation being that they simply want to look and feel good, just like the ilk they defend...
If you are that person who lacks humanity to those who have done nothing wrong, who punishes those who not only actively speak out against such acts but fight against it, who constantly preaches civility and morality yet providing absolutely fucking nothing during not only all of this, but continue to remain passive just so you can look good by saying "trans rights!!!!!" to appeal to these savages, claim "you can do both" while in plain sight doing only one thing, who can still respect such people while simultaneously absolve or encourage the destruction of the lives of anyone who even ever dared to disagree with you, who can still preach "everyone is human" while permitting such dehumanization...
Kill yourself.
I suppose I should also say this, despite how obvious it is.
Yes, there are trans people who haven't done anything wrong, have done no harassment, and thus do not deserve to be treated like shit.
However, the fact no one acknowledges the absolute toxicity of this group, while others are easily called out for their "problematic" nature, such as calling all Japanese people pedophiles and their entire culture pedophilia, is very much a problem that people not only refuse to acknowledge, but overtly use to their advantage to indulge in sadistic desires toward others.
I have said this many times, and I will say it again: Groups do not define an individual.
It is with utter stupidity that people judge others as if they were macroscopic concepts rather than actual living breathing humans with autonomy is disgusting and revolting, considering just how that dehumanizes people into nothing more but tools for sociological structures, as if those things weren't constructions built to improve human quality of life rather than a way to worsen it for many.
It is not hypocrisy to call out a large group of people who have engaged in inflicting suffering on this level, all of whom share a similar property.
It is, with hypocrisy, to judge someone in front of you who you openly can see not doing bad, and is simply living their lives, as evil, simply because they are similar to or are members in a group.
If you cannot see a human being who's simply living harmlessly right in front of you, based on stereotypes, rumors, stigmas, beliefs, then you are denying reality.
Of course, I doubt they could understand seeing reality for what it is, considering every moment, they deny it, from what they are physically, to their crimes and cruelty.
An alien concept that it is to judge people as themselves rather than as a group.
To be able to decide for yourself what's right and wrong, rather than having it be forced as an Aesop in every single piece of media they consume, enjoy it or not, because they can't know otherwise, and can't acknowledge ratings, disclaimers, and viewer discretion warnings to judge what they even want to consume.
To acknowledge that reality is not a fair half split between good and bad, pleasures and miseries, and all things in the end require independent consideration to truly judge, rather than generalize everything and obeying said generalizations even when reality at the time is not something the generalization is applicable to.
And all of that, does not only apply to the LGBTQ+, but everyone else, from the crusading fanatics, political extremists, eugenicists, nationalists, nazis, and so on.
Because this, among several other things, would've never happened if enough of the population was actually intelligent and genuinely of good nature.
It should not be evil to say that people need to do critical thinking more, to think for themselves, to understand the world for what it is, to understand others, to understand the reality we live in.
It should not be evil to indulge in harmless, victimless activities, to have individuality and be yourself.
It should not be evil to exchange information and engage in various topics of conversation, as it enriches both mind and life.
It should not be evil to be born.
I'm not asking anyone to force themselves to be friends with everybody.
What I ask is simply to acknowledge that everyone is human.
No one asked to be born, nor with anything that they have; disability, illness, neurodivergence.
With great luck, many are born with standard, healthy physicality, but not everyone.
No one wants to suffer, no matter who they are.
With great luck, many are born with loving families, and have unconditional love to help them grow and become strong, but not everyone.
I'm well aware that those with Gender Dysphoria are born with a brain and body which fit the opposite sexes; the brain female and body male, the brain male and body female.
They did not ask for such a brain or body which gives them great suffering.
They should not have to suffer for being born with something they didn't ask for, especially when it already makes them so miserable.
They should be accepted for who they are, what they are, and not be judged cruelly for the acts and beliefs of others.
That, however, does not justify inflicting suffering upon others for a fucking game, especially because the notion of a game causing rampant discrimination is as ridiculous as games causing violent crimes to increase.
I'd be a bit more lenient if people acknowledged themselves as done wrong and strive to minimize such acts or change completely, but as you can see from all that I've archived, no one is doing that.
All you see are sadistic monsters who care about nothing but themselves, actively dodging responsibility and accountability in the face of the consequences of all their actions, using the shield of "future genocide" and cloak of "discrimination" to do so.
All you see are fools who ignore and/or forgive such acts of dehumanization just to appear and feel like good people, who in truth have no understanding of how to make the world a better place, and more often than not, are willing to let or make others suffer, so long as they aren't affected or benefit from it; letting a kid drown in a lake to keep your shoes dry.
I expect about no one to conceive just how furious and utterly disappointed in humanity that such people make up a majority of this world.
Especially if it must always take something big like this to happen to realize just how utterly fucked something is before enough people even try to change things.
You may call me a hypocrite for dehumanizing these troons for their acts, while preaching all to be accepting of all.
I'm not Gandhi.
I do not plan to sacrifice my well-being to show co-existence is possible nor ask others to do that.
I'm not gonna ask the British Government back in WWII to lay down arms and let Nazi, Germany invade their land, take their homes, and be killed, with the only resistance being not being in allegiance with them.
I think there's a neat quote from these LGBTQ+ folks I wholeheartedly agree with, and apply to their intolerance towards anyone who doesn't believe them.
It's often used to demonize everyone they label as "Nazis," but I do believe Karl R. Popper has a point here; to tolerate beliefs which actively encourage dehumanization is suicide.
I do not ask for such people who believe in such things to be murdered, tortured, or forcefully "reeducated" to be compatible with society.
How did I come across this quote and know about it?
Because I'm literally friends with everyone and anyone who's a decent person, which surprisingly to everyone, exists everywhere, should you bother to actually see them.
But of course, said quote was taken out of context and abstracted to such a degree that "intolerance" itself must be vehemently denied at all corners of life.
Let's read the full quote.
The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise.
But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
I doubt anyone from their side would ever read this thread as a whole, even less so this, but hey, if you just so happen to care about this little thing, let's see what he really means.
Because trust me when I call myself a lay philosopher, because anyone who actually bothers to consider things for what they are and why they are should be capable of also analyzing others' interpretations and views, interpreting them, and being able to apply them in a way which strives for both a better self and surrounding world.
It is not "BAN ALL DISCUSSIONS OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM!!!"
It is not "BAN ALL DISCUSSIONS ABOUT EUGENICS!!!"
It is not "BAN ALL POSSIBLE TOPICS WHICH COULD IMPLY THE JUSTIFICATION OF TRANS GENOCIDE!!!"
It is, as he has said - "I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise."
Or in layman terms; plain English - "shit on bad ideas lmao"
Which is NOT what several movements preaching "tolerance" are doing, including this one; their entire movement is literally suppressing thought and enforcing thought crimes.
Now, the illiterate will soon claim, "IT'S SAYING WE SHOULD ONLY DEBATE THEM EVEN IF THEY'RE TRYING TO KILL US!!!"
What he actually said, however, is the exact opposite - "But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal."
In simple words, "Self defense is a right we have against people who do not want to be reasoned with."
Which, of course, as we've documented several times around this entire forum site, is something troons and the like are doing: refusing to meet us on the level of rational argument, and jumping straight to attacks, which luckily has mostly been communicative harassment, but unfortunately, there's many cases of rape regarding them, including children being exploited and mutilated, as listed.
It is ironic and sad that such a statement which doesn't restrict free flow of discussion (is literally considered unwise to do that) nor advocate violence has been co-opted by totalitarians to do just that.
A statement about self-defense being the only way to stop intolerant dictatorships is more referenced to try to get to such a bleak world.
You may call me a hypocrite for dehumanizing these troons for their acts, while preaching all to be accepting of all.
I say I'm invoking my right not to tolerate the intolerant.
I suggest others start doing the same, and acknowledging this to be the best decision against the menace that is the transgender movement, which has done more to not only suppress thought and violently enforce their beliefs, but also has damaged what acceptance is to those who have Gender Dysphoria.
I'm also out of patience to those who play the "buh das cream in nation?!?!?" game with me regarding these demons.
I consider them to be no different than the ones they defend, for they actively get in the way of our line of fire, and are used as nothing more than tools to make it appear as if they, a TOTALLY not sarcastic UNINVOLVED INNOCENT BOI WAS ATTACKED BY THESE so-called NAZIS, and consciously decide to be exactly that - a propaganda tool, a means to an end rather than a human being.
They, especially, are also not willing to meet any of us in actual rational argument, as they play a fool's act of being saintly rather than make any meaningful points.
Simply put, just imply and portray everyone who disagrees with you as dehumanizing you or your friends, even if they aren't doing that, and you'll look good enough for most people.
Crying "transphobic terf!!!!" when there is none, and pretending to have done good when you have done nothing.
I don't feel bad for doing things I've already been preemptively punished for.
I'm not going to feel bad with megalomaniacs playing victim to actually become one.
I'm gonna feel good when they finally shut the fuck up and never have the light of day without several tons of shit flung at them and their horrid beliefs.
And I feel good finally being able to finally say, with complete unabashed honesty, that every single maggot that went along with this charade are vermin, without looking like I'm a piece of shit who hates people who suffer from dysphoria for no good reason, because finally the spotlight is on how retarded these criminals are.
Honestly, I'm annoyed that I even have to write so goddamn much just to justify the absolute disgust I have for these people to have even an ounce of possible understanding despite the shit they've done in plain sight that are actively not only covered up, but ignored or absolved by everyone, either because it's a hassle or they themselves benefit from it, often in the form of enjoying being sadistic towards other people.
But honestly, if THIS isn't enough to convince a sane mind, do forgive the lack of academic and professional structure and diction alongside my justified disgust of the disregard of others' well-being, then I actually have no reason to believe said person is possibly human at the level of sentience/sapience.
I've covered about everything, unless someone wants to play eristic with me and I must definitively prove an abstract variable with absolute decisive evidence with impossible absolute certainty that these people are monsters to the degree which I explain why reality is, which I'm not gonna spend my time on, because it's fundamentally impossible to prove.
They're very much dehumanizing monsters. I'm doing what I feel is necessary, and luckily this act does not take lives to do, to fight against such people and their beliefs.
There is still room for redemption and change, but I'm not gonna wait around for it. If they wanna be respectable as a decent human being even after all they've said and done, it's on their own time, and not mine.
Man, so much for that "her graduation was planned" bullshit that one loser was trying to push, in just the thumbnail alone you can see that they rescheduled their 3 year anniversary:
Interesting, Pikamee is liking tweets that the fags claim is "dangerous"
I was indifferent towards trannies until I've noticed that every shitty localizer under the sun is a fucking tranny, then Keffals teaching minors to make estrogen and now this.
I was indifferent towards trannies until I've noticed that every shitty localizer under the sun is a fucking tranny, then Keffals teaching minors to make estrogen and now this.
Keffals is such a fucking joke.
Don't forget about the Catboy ranch situation or how she blew all her donation money on cocaine.
Why do people defend trannies so much? What value do they bring to our society?
they're acting like perverts in schools and in public and harassing anyone who criticizes them.
People only supported Keffals because they're a leftist troon. (People also defended fucking Chris-chan cause he trooned out) As for shit like Catboy Ranch, people love to pretend left-wing pedophilia doesn't exist or say its 'not AS bad'.
Man, so much for that "her graduation was planned" bullshit that one loser was trying to push, in just the thumbnail alone you can see that they rescheduled their 3 year anniversary:
So around the 7 minute mark, someone translating in chat claims Pikamee's graduation was planned "long, long back." My problem with this is then why change the date of the anniversary stream? Why did they have to reschedule with Marui if they all knew about it in advance "long, long back." There's also the issue of Pomu, who's not even affiliated with VOMS, claiming she knew about the "graduation" even though that's not what she actually said in her vod.
Feels very much like a bunch of people are trying to run interference so the harassment doesn't get blamed for her graduating. It's pretty clear that even if this was going to be her last year streaming, it was not going to end this early. It's abundantly clear, that this was a sudden decision by Pikamee.
It's hard to tell, the arrow they used makes it seem like they moved the date. They do have a waiting room that shows stream times for this weekend, which would be the anniversary dates. They seem to be keeping the anniversary stream, so that's good.
I think the thing that confirms the graduation wasn't planned for this month though, is that they had to contact Murai to make this collab about Pikamee's graduation.
>Pikamee's graduation was totally planned out in advance guys it had nothing to do with us harassing her into canceling a stream about a game we dont like, her going radio silent for a month only to come back and announce she is leaving we dindu nuthin but she deserved it!
So around the 7 minute mark, someone translating in chat claims Pikamee's graduation was planned "long, long back." My problem with this is then why change the date of the anniversary stream? Why did they have to reschedule with Marui if they all knew about it in advance "long, long back." There's also the issue of Pomu, who's not even affiliated with VOMS, claiming she knew about the "graduation" even though that's not what she actually said in her vod.
Feels very much like a bunch of people are trying to run interference so the harassment doesn't get blamed for her graduating. It's pretty clear that even if this was going to be her last year streaming, it was not going to end this early. It's abundantly clear, that this was a sudden decision by Pikamee.
If people are claiming that Pikamee's graduation was planned in advance then why did VOM Jp release this
statement stating her announcement was sudden and Unexpected?
If people are claiming that Pikamee's graduation was planned in advance then why did VOM Jp release this
statement stating her announcement was sudden and Unexpected?
If people are claiming that Pikamee's graduation was planned in advance then why did VOM Jp release this
statement stating her announcement was sudden and Unexpected?
Even the shitty engrish translated one that GYARI put out states that they had to speak with Murai about changing what the stream was going to be about. If the graduation was planned, why would they need to do that? I noticed none of the fags were able to or willing answer this simple issue with the statements.
Could Pikamee have been planning to graduate this year, possibly. If that was the case, as I stated before, this was not the actual timeframe of her leaving. It's clear for anyone that's not a lying bottom feeder or is an actual fan of VOMS that the harassment was the catalyst for her leaving this soon.
here is a translation of the relevant part of the stream. seems he's very clear and wants to emphasise that this was planned "a long time ago"
I think it's safe to assume she was indeed planning to leave pre-HogLeg, however (and this might just be cope) I do think it's also safe to assume HogLeg did in fact play a role in pushing her to pull the trigger. there are too many coincidences and inconsistencies in the statements. and the timing lines up to well. I think if she did pull the trigger sometime after or around the 10th that would be more than enough time to hash shit out with the event org
regardless. I dont think her planning to leave pre-hogleg should be used to downplay or dismiss the fact she was indeed harassed. and I think the fact she's been liking and unliking tweets directly related to calling out bullies somewhat indicates she does in fact care about it on some level. the narrative is going to be pushed by bad actors who want to try and escape responsibility for what they did. so dont let them run away from the consequences of their actions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
docs.google.com
