• If you're here for vtubers, I highly recommend you go to The Virtual Asylum instead.
    They'll love you there

Discussion Arguing with antis

visitor

varishangout.com
So, according to antis lolicon images will turn you into a pedo. But why playing GTA does not turns you into a criminal? Why they don't want to ban all shooters or any kill-to-score games?

I'm thinking about making a some sort of list of better answers to their popular arguments, to make their arguments look like a complete bullshit (as they actually are). And spread it as a memo, like Q&A. I mean not everybody knows how to handle braindead antis.

What do you think?

You can post Argument-Response in this thread, and then we can get best responses (according to likes and common sense) and compile them into a memo.

It can help not only in dispute, but also help to those who are doubts about we are actually right and the truth is on our side.
Actually, those responses can be addressed more to neutral readers of such disputes, which there are many more than antis of any kind. This can help them to choose the right side eventually.

For example:

Argument: Lolis are illegal!
Response: No, lolis are completely legal under US law and criminalizing of depictions of any kind are unconstitutional. Here is proof:
Argument: Lewding lolis turns you into a pedo!
Response: No. This is like saying "Porn turns you into a sex maniac". Where are all those rapists? There should be a lot more of them! In reality most porn consuming countries shows population growth speed decreasing. Japan, most lolicon consuming country, shows one of the lowest child abuse statistics.

Responses should preferably be short and convincing.
You can offer your better variants of course.

Sorry my English really sucks.
 

Halo

varishangout.com
Regular
Here is my position, stop arguing with internet retards and just laugh at them, you are never going to convince regardless if you are 100% right
You know what this is better advice than what I was gonna say

Response: No, lolis are completely legal under US law and criminalizing of depictions of any kind are unconstitutional. Here is proof:
Theres also section 502 on this

I remember it because some twitter faggot decided to cut out the "affirmative defense" part.
If you ever see anyone post this, make sure they don't try and dick you by cutting out the top part.
1614388737205.png
 

Hibiki

varishangout.com
Regular
You know what this is better advice than what I was gonna say

Theres also section 502 on this

I remember it because some twitter faggot decided to cut out the "affirmative defense" part.
If you ever see anyone post this, make sure they don't try and dick you by cutting out the top part.
View attachment 591
Well, if you are bored and you don't feel you are getting mentally affected by doing this, you shouldn't try to convince the person or group of people you are discussing with, but rather you should try to do your best to convince the people reading it, you are never going to change an anti opinion, but you could try to convince a third person reading it.
 

Hexasheep93

varishangout.com
Regular
I only had one fruitful discussion with an anti and really just ended in a lets agree to disagree rather than them accepting that fantasy and reality are not the same. the rest of the time is them just calling you a pedo or blocking you when they run out of arguments
 

Dynasty11

varishangout.com
People like to tweet like crazy. Think of this video showing where idiots come from. Cause this vid reminds me of SJWs demanding what they want. It's a good clip example. Think of it as an anti.

 
Top