Kera reposted my translation of his article here:
Source:『映画秘宝』2024年5月号 By Mushizuka Mushizou (虫塚虫蔵) Appearing like a comet during the dawning era of Bishoujo Anime, making the world aware of the existence of ero-anime, 'Cream Lemon' Volume 1 'Be My Baby' (1984/08/Fairy Dust) OVA Jacket.The progenitor of ero-anime, 'Lolita Anime Ⅲ: Koneko-chan
note.com
(Please share this link with anyone you know that has an interest in 'hentai'.)
As a matter of fact I do have some nice comfy sweaters. I like wearing them in winter.
That's good to hear; didn't want to have my mental image of you ruined.
I still find it concerning that a word could either refer to an otaku that is fan of a niche type of fiction or to a child molester
When someone is talking about a Lolicon teacher, they're not talking about a guy sitting at his desk reading manga with the words '3DPG' (3D Pig Disgusting) tattooed to his forehead. The common sentiment is that all Japanese men are terminally ill with Lolicon, and that doubly goes for male teachers.
Graduation (2005/03/18) (Link):
"(Side note - I was later telling a female Japanese friend of mine about this and the snuzzlebunnies incident. She laughed and said "But you were happy, right?" ....NO I WAS NOT HAPPY! I'm not a Japanese man, I don't have lolicon. ...Lolicon being shorthand for "lolita complex", the name given to the far too common Japanese male phenomenon of loving jr high/high school girls. ...I told you the men in this country weren't right.)" (The author of this article seems to be pretty famous in Japan; a South Korean mangaka incorporated him and his family into his manga, I need to go through my books so I can find this again.)
You later mentioned Comic LO, and I believe their slogan is 'YES, Lolita. NO, Touch'. Which is basically how these Lolicon teachers should behave. In this thread, there's often talk about a separation between Lolicon and Degenerates/Perverts with Hirukogami Ken pretending to be a Lolicon degenerate with his proto-Otaku character, but outside of the character, he's strongly against people who 'touch' like Roman Polanski. But regardless, if you read Japanese, you'll see headlines like 'Chinese Lolicon Teacher Rapes 5 Students and is Swiftly Given Death Penalty'.
Coincidentally, on Kera's note page, he has an article with all the entries of his 'dream diary' (
Link) that also includes his original art, and one of them is 'The Cat Girl and the Lolicon Teacher'.
「A cat disguised as a girl uses a time machine without permission on a school trip, so the Lolicon teacher (Contemporary Japanese Language Teacher) uses that as an excuse to assault her, saying, "What do you think will happen if you caused a time paradox? Eh?" The cat girl scratches the teacher, and transforms into a cat to run away, but she wound up being shot to death by the teacher. Bright red blood was flowing.」(Kinda surprised how many of Kera's dreams involve guns.)
I've been mostly focusing on artists in this thread because that's what I'm personally interested in, but when it comes to Otaku, there's Anime Otaku and Idol Otaku with the latter being more numerous with the bigger industry that often sinks its tentacles into the manga and anime industries. Most of manga and anime culture is shaped and influenced by the idol industry, and that includes Lolicon. You can look up the Japanese name of any idol, and there's a good chance the word 'loli' (ロリ) is attributed to her at some point in her career. It's why 'Moe' became a word to act as a substitute for how Lolicon was used by the manga fandom in the 1980s. Instead of saying 猫耳コン (Nekomimicon; Cat Ear Complex), you can say '猫耳萌え' (Nekomimi-Moe) and it would be understood you were talking about illustrations featuring anime characters with cat ears. But because the idol industry cannot leave well enough alone, Moe has been kidnapped by them, and degenerated into being a synonym for 'cute'.
Since there's no response from dannyphantom, I'm pondering whether I should repost his full message. I've been largely avoiding idols, lolita video, and that sort of thing, and his post was sort of a summary on that (if he stuck around, I was going to ask him if he wanted to translate some articles I didn't feel like doing about those subjects).
I guess the first that spring to mind is "comic LO", would that count as an anthology?
I don't think it does, Comic LO is part of the long lineage of Lolicon Comic magazines (
Lolicon Manga Wiki) following 'Comic Rin', which I'm more familiar with since Rin had artists like Lee and Nekogen; I don't know anyone who draws for LO, so I never bothered with it. But Akaneshoten, its publisher, has other magazines like 'Girls for M', which is supposedly a supplementary magazine to Comic LO with artists I am familiar with like Matanonki▼ (またのんき▼) (he favourited one of my Pixiv illustrations of his character).
Labyrinth Members (Image Source: 'Comic Market Genesis' [コミックマーケット創世記]:
Harada Teruo (原田央男):
1st Comiket Representative.
Yonezawa Yoshihiro (米澤嘉博):
2nd Comiket Representative.
Aniwa Jun (亜庭じゅん):
Founder of MGM and the one who wrote most of the articles in Labyrinth's 'Manga Critique' (漫画新批評大系).
Takamiya Seika (高宮成河):
Close friends of the above three, though not closely involved in the managment of Comiket. Originally worked with Aniwa Jun at Manga Journal (漫画ジャーナル) before joining Labyrinth, writing for Labyrinth's 'Manga Critique' (漫画新批評大系). He's responsible for editing and compiling Aniwa Jun's writing, and also doing the original work for their wikipedia page, so much of what is known about Labyrinth is thanks to him.
Despite this, I could not find a single English mention for Takamiya Seika, which is disappointing. Comiket is well-known outside Japan, but it seems no one has bothered to do a thorough and accurate history of its earliest members in English (I wouldn't be surprised if this thread is the first time a full article by Aniwa Jun and Harada Teruo has been translated into English). Takamiya Seika was also present during the Gekiga Roundtable talk with Kawamoto Kouji and Takatori Ei translated earlier in this thread.
In any case, the following mentions Lolicon, but it's more accurate to say this is Comiket and Aniwa Jun's history. Yonezawa Yoshihiro is deeply entwined in Lolicon History, but Aniwa Jun shares a lot in common with Kobayashi Yoshinori regarding Lolicon.
Source: 『MGM100カタログ』(2013年1月27日 MGM、迷宮'13、自費出版)
Illustration: Konami* (粉味)
※Circle Name for the artist Chiba Konami (ちば こなみ)
Aniwa Jun's Speech
1981 Spring Comic Market 17 Review Meeting
We present to you a recording of Aniwa Jun's (亜庭じゅん) speech during the review meeting at Comic Market 17. Comiket17 was held in April of 1981, and the next Comiket18 was held in August of the same year. Immediately after Comiket18 ended, the Comiket Preparations Committee faced a coup d'état (schism). Aniwa Jun completed the 4th event since MGM began August of the previous year at this time, and was preparing to hold the 5th event in May.
From 1979 when Comiket's first representative, Harada Teruo (原田央男), resigned, Comiket was in a period of turmoil until 1981 when the new representative, Yonezawa Yoshihiro (米澤嘉博), moved the venue to Harumi, and starting MGM was one answer to that chaos by Aniwa Jun. For MGM to be celebrating its 100th anniversary, looking back on Aniwa Jun's words amidst the turmoil back then is also looking back on the dreams MGM held during its beginnings. These words were said over 30 years ago, but MGM has lived with them for many years.
Just before Comiket17 was held, its representative, Yonezawa Yoshihiro, went missing and couldn't be contacted on the day of the event. Due to the absence of its representative, another representative was hastily appointed to hold the event. Although Aniwa Jun had no plans to participate, he was abducted by one of the Preparations Committee staff and ended up participating. Seats for the review meeting were also prepared next to the Preparations Committee.
The review meeting back then consisted of two parts. Due to concerns about the management of the Preparations Committee that had surfaced as a result of the deteriorating and expansion of Comiket becoming more noticeable each time it's held, a 'Comiket Think Tank' was formed by volunteers from participating Circles, appealing with a sense of impending doom to Comiket. During Comiket17, some members of the Preparations Committee attended and a discussion was held with them in a room at the venue, and the review session was held afterwards. Due to Yonezawa Yoshihiro's absence, the review meeting took the form of a free talk instead of the usual Q&A between the Preparations Committee and participants. The host was a member of the 'Comiket Think Tank'. They spent about two hours talking about 'regulations' for the ever-increasing number of participants, about the Preparations Committee and Circles, and about the topic 'What is Comiket?'; however, partly due to Yonezawa's absence, Aniwa Jun naturally assumed the role of taking over the discussion and speaking. This is an excerpt of what Aniwa Jun said on that day.
《The talk began with how to deal with the chaos at the venue due to the increase in the number of participants. After the Preparations Committee and participants took turns talking about their understanding of the current situation, the problems, and the ways to improve upon them, the participants made various suggestions to the management, and the following is the answer from the Preparations Committee that deciding on such matters itself is regulation, and once this happens, regulations will increase one after another.》
Aniwa:
Please listen to my opinion as someone who has been involved with Comiket from the inside for a long time rather than my opinion as one part of the Preparations Committee. ――If anything, the most desirable situation for Comiket would be for what the participants mentioned to happen voluntarily from the Circles themselves, rather than the Circles being regulated. So, the regulatory issues are simply, err, right now, they're actually technical issues, like the problem with the number of people, the problem with space, or the problem with security, and so on, but well, this is being discussed here, but speaking more broadly, for example, err, the problem that was brought up by the 'Comiket Think Tank' when ○○-kun, who's acting as host now, gave his talk, the problem involving anime Circles selling products such as envelopes and stationery using characters, or things like posters and dolls, which obviously violate copyright. We're caught in quite a conundrum. Well, some are in the clear about releasing such things, but most in reality, if they're accused (of copyright infringement), they would be held responsible. If something like that were to become a problem within Comiket, in a sense, it would be a huge blow to the fan activities Comiket has fostered with those Circles. In other words, there's a possibility the rights holders may seize control of, even regulate, fan clubs based on their commercial interests. There's also problem with original work Circles. While most release original works because they enjoy it, some of those sell well. For example, Cybele sells well. So they create Lolicon-type things for the purpose of them selling well, err, well, mumumu, but that (ero because it sells well) is going to lead to the rug being pulled out from under us. This may be an old-fashioned sentiment, but to put it bluntly, I believe it's a corruption of the proper attitude for original work creation. Broadly speaking, the regulation problems are a matter of how seriously the Circles that participate in Comiket take their doujinshi and Circle activities, so if things don't go too far, it'll remain a simple technical problem. Technical problems can be solved technically if there's enough space, enough money, and enough manpower, but in the end, each Circle needs to think about what they need to do for Comiket on their own volition. I don't believe there'll be a final solution if we don't get these points correct, no matter how far we go. On the other hand, if there's a solid consensus among the Circles, I believe many of these problems will be solved, no matter how complicated. So, the most dangerous ones are the problems that are biggest traps I mentioned earlier. Meaning, those who stay here are good people, and those who return home are bad people, this statement, to put it bluntly, is an excuse. Against ourselves――. Well then, you may have stayed at the review meetings every time, but what did you do when you stayed at the review meetings? I know I'm rattling on, but have you made any efforts for the Preparations Committee? I would like people to reconsider what Comiket means to them, including these issues.
Well, this is what I think.
《His response to a question from the Preparations Committee staff who asked us to think about what the participant should do if Comiket could not be held due to our own mismanagement, such as not being able to bring desks to the site.》
Aniwa:
(Taking the microphone while saying 'I don't think so, that's not good'.) As a single participants, I shall respond to what you just said. Regardless of whether there are desks or not, I encourage the Preparations Committee to work in an orderly fashion, and encourage other Circles to do likewise. That's the only way. If we stop, then it will confuse the regular participants that we stopped, and I don't think there's any point in having the regular participating Circles do something like that (without desks). So, let's return the topic back to the extreme point made earlier. Meaning, these opinions that came from the Preparations Committee that Comiket should just get bigger and bigger, or that the people who are currently doing Comiket is because they love doing it. This matches the current state of the Preparations Committee, and it's also half-true when you compare it with the current state of Comiket. However, as someone who has been involved with Comiket since the very beginning, Comiket, according to its 1st to 8th reports, there hasn't been a direct filing of such a thing in the Comiket Reports. What I mean specifically are the Doujinshi's original manga, some new kind of manga being born based on that. That was the starting point of Comiket. That sort of thing's a very big aspect for Comiket. A problem in communication, I'm certain. There's also the issue of buying and selling. However, when we first thought up Comiket, our simplest and most fundamental motive was――well, there was an incident (refusing individuals to participate at a manga convention), and it's like you cannot buy doujinshi (by denying a manga convention). Well, it's a bit bad. We wanted to buy doujinshi, we wanted to sell them, or we wanted to sell the doujinshi we created. So we created that sort of place. That's simply how we came up with the idea. However, what was behind it was doujinshi, so let's switch the topic to manga doujinshi. I assumed something similar could be found in fan club magazines, but as far as manga doujinshi is concerned, its greatest communication isn't a quick chat on the spot, it's not something like shaking each other's hands and being glad we could become friends. I believe the best way to communicate is to convey the emotions the work itself possesses. So, buying and selling itself becomes communication. Comiket was at first that sort of place. And contrary to my expectations, or should I say it was a bit of an understatement, the communication in other areas, in other words, how many friends there were――we didn't know anything about each other, but well, manga fans can be a bit narrow-minded, so I'm happy we made a place where we didn't have to feel so narrow-minded. That tacit understanding between friends has become something of a major element to Comiket. At the same time, manga doujinshi doesn't necessarily need to be about original work, there's anime, there's fan club magazines, and there's many other kinds, so it expanded into a great big Circle. However, among them, I haven't been able to see the progress I had hoped for in terms of original manga. Its progress was very shallow. The progress itself may have been slow, but there was something failing in that area. So, that part, so to speak, err, the most basic part of it has shaken my way of thinking about Comiket. Well, as you know, the representative of Comiket has changed along the way. There's some things related to that (the reason for the change), but――I don't feel comfortable discussing them in detail, but I guess that's not good? However, Harada, who was the former representative until around 1979-1980, continued to emphasise manga unique to doujinshi in every Comiket Report, and by the end, he sort of gave up on doujinshi manga and withdrew from Comiket. So, one more thing, the Comiket friends and groups I mentioned earlier is proof the excitement of having a lot of people, or the excitement of having a lot of friends, can turn things into a festival. (I) opened a small market (MGM) that focuses on original manga. This is very empty. It's a world that makes you go 'is that it?'. The kind of Comiket-like environment or enthusiasm couldn't have been created there. I think there's something else. Although this may sound self-congratulatory. However, it's just what Comiket has, and it seems like it melts everything, well, it's a very great power of communication, but I don't know how sincere that communication actually is, although I have my doubts about it, it's true I didn't have the power to create that great sense of camaraderie. In other words, the dilemma Comiket's currently facing is, for one, the numbers to secure Comiket being fun, I believe how to overcome that part will probably be the greatest problem for the Preparations Committee as well as for the participants. So, right or wrong, the current situation is that we don't know what we should do to be honest, and on the other hand, what I would like to ask is, from each and every one of you attending Comiket, what do you think about the state of Comiket?
《In response to the words of taking the opinions from this review meeting home and thinking about them in bed. Everyone has different opinions, so one cannot draw any conclusions here.》
Aniwa:
(Stealing the host's microphone.) If you want to think about them when you get home, then you should think about them now! Well, everyone thinks differently, but even if you go home and think about them all by yourself, what do you hope to achieve by that? The biggest problem——is what we're going to be hashing out here today, you know? Supposing he or they go home and think about it in bed, they'll come to their own conclusion, right?
However, 3 months after that, when they attend the Summer Comiket's review meeting, the conclusion they thought about will have already gone the way of the ghost. The progress that has been discussed here will also have gone the way of the ghost. So, we'll have to start over and they'll have to think about it in bed again. We've been doing this over and over again. This time, the Comiket Preparations Committee tentatively set up a 'Comiket Think Tank', right? To do that, we had to make arrangements with the Preparations Committee. That sort of situation happened, you see, and it makes me seriously question how much they actually thought about what we discussed in their futon. Even in this sort of place, for example, there's a part where everyone wants to be a good kid. Though, it won't come out individually. So, if I say everything's all well and good, I would get a fair amount of applause. However, even looking at the applause I've received till now, it's dampening the mood. We can't just end this in a cool way by saying stuff like we exchanged opinions. I believe a discussion under such conditions would be truly fruitless. The problem is how do we continue to bring awareness to that which has festered so much, and how to reflect it in the management of Comiket and the Preparations Committee, or to put it another way, pull it into the consciousness of the people here? In order to achieve this, what should the humans here do, or where should they look for an opportunity to take action? If we don't talk about these things in concrete terms, I believe this sort of discussion will continue to be a repeat of abstract opinions. So, for example, in my case, I believe I'm even more disappointed than him (someone who said earlier he was disappointed in Comiket). My fundamental way of thinking is that, to put it bluntly, the person who said that buying and selling is 'that' (their purpose), and what he said to him (someone who said such people do not fit the purpose of Comiket) is if that were true, why don't you just make a doujinshi that will make me want to buy it. He responded to that. He said he's going to make a doujinshi you couldn't help but want to buy. I believe that conflict is the fundamental power of Comiket. So, if it weren't for that, I also wouldn't come to Comiket, but I believe Comiket still has the power I just mentioned. That's why I'm participating, but I believe I wouldn't hesitate to abandon it if it weren't for that. That's what Comiket means to me. ——Well, others may think differently. So, what I want to say is that it would be better to include things like that and think about what you want to do about it. I still believe what's been going on at this point was an argument that'll get us nowhere, but that's the way things are.
《At this point, the host announced they're already over time and concluded the review session.》
My Impressions of... Back Then (Takamiya Seika [高宮成河])
I heard there was a tape of Aniwa Jun's 'speech' at the Comiket review meeting, so in the summer of 2011, six months after his death, I attended a training camp to think about the future of MGM at the Kawasaki Civic Plaza. At the time, I was editing a collection of Aniwa Jun's posthumous manuscripts (Aniwa Jun Complete Works [亜庭じゅん大全]), and I was collecting all sorts of things Aniwa Jun left behind. I requested a search for the tape, hoping to include it in a collection of his posthumous manuscripts, but it didn't make it into the publication; it wasn't until December of 2012 I received word of its discovery. The published collection of his posthumous manuscripts includes Comiket Reports from back then that were published in the MGM newspaper, but the raw tape had a real sense of urgency due to his actual voice, which is different from the one that was transcribed later into text.
Aniwa Jun (亜庭じゅん), Harada Teruo (原田央男), and Yonezawa Yoshihiro (米澤嘉博), these three formed the group called 'Labyrinth' (迷宮), and Comic Market was started in 1975 as a result of criticism towards manga conventions. Harada Teruo, who served as the representative of Comiket, struggled to hold each event while trying to create a model for Comiket, which began in a period where its future was uncertain, but resigned as representative in the summer of 1979. The matters surrounding this period are detailed in 'Comic Market Genesis' (コミックマーケット創世記) published by Harada. I'll talk about my impressions later.
I don't wish to be formal, so from now on, I'll be using their nicknames, Aniwa Jun is 'Anijun' (あにじゅん), and Yonezawa Yoshihiro will be 'Yoneyan' (米やん). The first Comiket with Yoneyan as the new representative was held in the winter of 1979, and Anijun started working on MGM the following summer of 1980. At first, it wasn't MGM, it was called 'Manga Mini Market' (まんが・ミニ・マーケット), but well, let's just call it MGM.
For a half year, one year after Harada resigned as representative, during this six-month gap between Comikets, Anijun decided to start working on MGM.
The reason Yoneyan was the second representative was because there were no other suitable humans, but Yonewan, who received the role, did not necessarily welcome it. Harada's resignation was sudden, and it was clear from those watching, he took the role in a state of chaos. When he became the second representative, Comiket was in a state where it had a mountain of problems.
When Comiket started, most manga doujinshi were nothing but original doujinshi, so presuming Comiket was an original manga doujinshi exhibition and sale event was so natural, one didn't have to think about it, but as time went on, elements other than original works, such as anime fan clubs and cosplay, started to become more prominent, and eventually Lolicon doujinshi, which can hardly be called original works, became popular, and people, calling themselves security guards, began to protest around the Preparations Committee. In addition, the confusion at the venue due to the increase in the number of participating Circles and participants had become impossible to ignore, and the limits of the traditional methods of the management were becoming apparent.
There were two problems. The first was considering what to do about Comiket, which was degenerating into a place for 'play'. The second was what to do about its management, which was on the verge of bankruptcy because it could no longer keep up with the increase in numbers. Comiket wasn't started to create a place for play.
Play wasn't something to be denied, but it should've only served in nothing greater than a sub position. There was a growing fear the entirety of Comiket would be dominated by 'play with manga', and at the same time, there was a growing feeling that this was somehow bad. There was an urgent need to confirm its direction and reorganise the system, but Yoneyan didn't take any measures.
At this moment, Comic Market could neither move forward nor retreat; it was in a state where the event would continue to be held while stagnating, and there was a fear the ship would eventually sink.
That said, perhaps we should sympathise with Yoneyan at this time. Yoneyan's position was similar to that of a young, second generation president who has taken over a company whose production sites are full of defective products and whose costs were constantly rising. Furthermore, he didn't become the second representative because he desired it. However, sympathise with him as you may, the young, second generation president was the managing director right until he took over the company, and was appointed after knowing all of its circumstances, so he was also in a position where he had to take half the responsibility for the current situation, so he had no grounds to grumble and complain, but rather I believe he still had a responsibility to quickly direct a policy.
He probably had a personality not to take action until the very last minute, but what tied Yoneyan's hands must've been the 12th Comiket that supported the event he also served as a key staff member. Comiket began as a protest against the exclusion of specific individuals from manga conventions, and the unwritten rule that was born from that was the organiser could not arbitrarily exclude any individuals or groups. This was established based on the recognition Labyrinth, which was the actual organiser, was just one of the participating Circles, and had no arbitrary authority other than to reflect the consensus of the Circles, and the 'Preparations Committee', whose sole purpose was to hold 'meetings', was so vague and transparent that it was quite difficult to decide on anything.
Although it was known from the beginning there could be no such thing as a consensus among Circles, he at least maintained that cause by showing he was willing to work in that direction. For this reason, preparatory meetings, extended meetings, and review meetings played an important role at Comiket. All participants were equal, and in a free place of amateurs to make friends, it's precisely because it's that sort of place that new manga was born. There, even ordinary readers could become active collaborators in original works.
Some could call it childish idealism or high-sounding talk, but without holding such idealism, who would prefer to do something that just wastes time, nerves, and effort? In fact, this idealism also motivated us to continue holding Comiket in the early days, and even if some call it childish, our partner was manga, so of course it was childish, but we didn't feel that way about it; we were mostly fine and actually felt honoured. We all shared an awareness we were doing something like that. I believe there was a sense of excitement as the number of participants continued to increase each time, as there was now a place where adult realism could be challenged by childish idealism.
However, before we realised it, our childish idealism was forced to face the reality we created for ourselves. In that place, Yoneyan and Comiket just stood still, unable to take the next step. Participating Circles, noticing things were not going as well as they were, began to form a 'Comiket Think Tank'. Although he knew he needed to show his determination to take the next step, he only hesitated and did nothing. I also believe that inside Yoneyan, he might've been desperately trying to relive the 12th Harada Comiket in the Comiket he would represent. This may sound harsh to the Yoneyan back then, but at least within the Preparations Committee, they should've shared a sense of crisis and unified their wills, but even in that area, Yoneyan failed. If I were to use Aniwa Jun's words, 'Yonezawa was throwing half-hearted pitches'. This seemingly irresponsible attitude of Yoneyan eventually led to the coup d'état. From the perspective of the coup d'état faction, Yoneyan may have been seen as a dictator who could not make decisions.
On the other hand, Anijun, who was the managing director, made a clear decision. His goal was to cut down the unprofitable aspects, which had grown too large due to customer demands, and return to regular business. He downsized and formed a separate venture. If I dare say it, that was MGM. Of all the members of Labyrinth, Anijun spoke about his ideals the most, but it was Anijun who spoke about how to turn his ideals into a reality.
Many of those who know Anijun often talk about him being an idealist, but few talk about his side as a realist. It appears to me when MGM began that Anijun's realist side was most strong. Anijun's MGM was a return to the roots of when they first began Comiket. The problem with Comiket's management boils down to allowing it to expand in size.
Once he abandoned anime fans and cosplay among other things, and specialised in original doujinshi, most of the problems that arose from expansion of scale were solved. It also served as a return to the original purpose of creating new manga unique to doujinshi. At least, even if Comiket were to go bankrupt, if an original doujinshi exhibition and sale event continued, that part alone should have been salvageable. It was a straightforward and reasonable method for Anijun to take back then, and Yoneyan understood MGM's intentions.
"Yoneyan said MGM was an insurance policy for Comiket!" After Yoneyan's death, I heard this from a bell as Yoneyan's words.
The 1st MGM began by inviting original work Circles that gathered at Comiket to participate. It was established as a place for calm creation rather than a boisterous festival, and he planned to hold the event about five times a year with the aim of making it a normal place actively collaborating with local exhibition and sale events.
At first, the concept of an original doujinshi exhibition and sale event seemed strange, and some said it was a 'exhibition and sale event no one attended', but gradually, the number of participating Circles increased, and now it boasts itself a place where high-quality doujinshi gather in a high density with some Circles only participating at MGM. JET PROPOST, the sponsor Circle of Nagoya's Comica (コミカ), wrote on their participating Circle cut, "Our books won't be sold anywhere other than MGM".
At its peak, the venue was overflowing with Circles, and the event was held five or six times a year.
Anijun turned MGM's sponsorship into Labyrinth, eliminating the ambiguous existence of the Preparations Committee. It answered the question for what purpose was MGM held.
Rather than relying on the wavering and vague consensus of Circles, MGM opened its doors to the dream and possibilities of an exhibition and sale event that Yoneyan and the three of them saw during the Harada Comiket period, and the word Labyrinth was used to represent the group's vision rather than the group's name. At this moment, MGM and exhibition and sale events were not held by an organisation or group, or even a representative, but by a dream. And Anijun himself continued to refer to himself as 'MGM staff', maintaining his stance he was also one of the collaborators in realising their dream. This also may be another kind of childish idealism.
I'm running out of paper. So I'll wrap things up.
The Comiket coup d'état was nothing more than an internal conflict caused by the indecisive attitude of Yoneyan, who did not directly confront the dissatisfaction that had surfaced within the Preparations Committee. As a result, he cut off his former friends in a manner close to a purge, which will definitely remain as a blemish on the history of Comiket. However, ironically, this incident was a blessing in disguise for Comiket. By moving the venue to Harumi, Yoneyan was forced to make a choice due to the uproar, and finally gained the resolve to continue holding Comiket.
From the reorganisation of the Preparations Committee and the organiser serving a management function independent from Circles, what they created could be called a 'philosophy'. There's a phrase 'There are no customers at Comiket', but to me, it sounds like words for the management cloaked in ideology. And under the slogan of 'freedom of expression', fan play and original works were treated as equals, and at last the responsibility for the fact original works end up being play for the venue rested on the 'freedom' of the participants. Yoneyan himself, including the word 'Comiket Representative', did not differentiate between his dual roles as representative of the Preparations Committee and representative of Comiket as a whole, and ended up using his position wisely.
What Yoneyan decided to undertake in Harumi was for the purpose of holding Comiket on top of accepting all who wish to participate, and he was responsible for only that. And the rest was to be shelved to allow things to take their course. The course Yoneyan took here was to abandon the childish idealism of that 12th Comiket, which he half-intentionally made vague. He used the veil of idealism on the surface while placing realism at its core. Even if we understood the route, whose sole purpose was to hold an event, was Yoneyan's choice for the survival of Comiket, Anijun became a strong critic of the indecency of this trick. Yoneyan kept silent.
The reason Yoneyan decided to shelve everything besides holding an event was because what was set as the purpose of Comiket to create new manga unique to doujinshi, MGM which specialised in that, might have taken over.
Thanks to MGM, he couldn't ignore the degeneration of Comiket into a boisterous festival where you could freely join in fan play. In the words of Yoneyan's 'insurance', Comiket used MGM as a psychological alibi back then, and to me, I believe he also thought of it as a complement. If that's the case, it may be better to describe it as Yoneyan's selfish and one-sided 'unspoken deal'.
The Comiket representative transfer, the beginning of MGM, the coup d'état, the moving to Harumi, during the two hectic years from 1979 to 1981, he faced the reality he had created for himself, and once again, the underlying questions were 'What is a doujinshi exhibition and sale event?' and 'Why am I opening an exhibition and sale event?'.
Harada Teruo resigned as representative because he was unable to decide his position between these two questions, which were becoming increasingly distant.
Anijun forcibly brought together the two questions that were trying to split, and tried to return to their roots when they began an exhibition and sale event.
By shelving both questions and not thinking about them, Yoneyan was barely able to keep the event going.
I don't feel like questioning the validity of the answers these three parties have given now, but I believe it was a way for each of them to take responsibility for what they have 'started' together.
Regardless of their different routes, Anijun and Yoneyan continued in their choices until the end. It must've been a way of tying themselves down.
From the Harada Comiket, the two exhibition and sale events that branched continued to be held for about a quarter of a century with many twists and turns. And this would continue until they both passed away. Yoneyan passed away on October 1st of 2006, and six months later, MGM97 would be Anijun's final MGM. The two exhibition and sale events were held for exactly the same period of time, as if they agreed upon it. On January 21st, 2011, Anijun also passed away.
After Anijun's death, I heard from a bell as Yoneyan said, "Even if I don't believe in anything else, I'll believe in MGM". I faintly felt Yoneyan's loneliness. And I considered what Yoneyan believed in MGM.
Amidst the noise of Comiket, what Yoneyan believed in were his Labyrinth days and when they began an exhibition and sale event, the time he spent staying up all night talking to Anijun, Harada Teruo, and the others, what he lost in order to maintain Comiket, perhaps it was the 'childish idealism' Anijun continued to defend to his death with MGM.
Anijun and Yoneyan, despite going in different directions, were cleaning up the aftermath of the dream they shared. That's what I feel.
(Addendum: After writing this manuscript, the recordings of the MGM5, MGM7, and Comiket19 review meetings were discovered. I thought it might've been possible to reconstruct 'those days' in a different form by combining them with the Comiket17 review meeting recorded here, but I ran out of time and had no choice but to give up. My honest impression after listening to those recordings was that Anijun and Yoneyan were young back then, but so was the exhibition and sale event. Whether I wanted to or not, I felt many of the comments from the participants about doujinshi could be described as naive and without regrets. This may be something that has already been lost now that doujinshi exhibition and sale events are no longer something special. 'Those days' were a special time that can never be repeated. I believe doujinshi exhibition and sale events needed to go through that special time.)
Manga Doujinshi Activities and 'Everyday Life' (Harada Teruo)
Do (Manga) doujin use manga as an intermediary and form relationships with other 'like-minded kin'? In other words, not just simple manga fanciers, but those who accept human relationships formed through manga.
Living for more than 30 (40?) years until his untimely death, defining himself as 'doujin', Aniwa Jun (Real Name: Matsuda Shigeki [松田茂樹]) was not a man who was very adept at socialising, but he was passionate about finding meaning in doujin activities while connecting with people through manga. In the early days of his involvement with manga doujin, he was involved in the activities and displayed his talent by writing reviews that he could work on by himself, but when 'Comic Market', the manga doujin exhibition and sale event established by the critique group 'Labyrinth' which he joined as a comrade, eventually started to go astray, he established 'MGM (Manga Gallery Market)' which he described as an 'original doujinshi exhibition and sale event'. Since then, he launched various projects at MGM, such as 'For Ladys' and 'A Long Long Story' among others, inspiring participants and exploring the development of worlds and new works through original manga doujin.
However, ironically, due to the proliferation and success of the manga doujinshi exhibition and sale events started by Labyrinth's 'Comic Market', MGM drowned in this situation without fully demonstrating its own originality. Nevertheless, Aniwa Jun continued to host MGM, but his stance shifted from exploring the potential of manga to securing a space for regular participating Circles who enjoyed MGM. I'm sure he wasn't unwilling to put himself in the position he found himself in at his beloved MGM, but if he continued doujin only to mutually seek warmth, he would've had no choice but to shut down his activities. This must've been something Aniwa Jun, who aimed for a 'movement' to encourage others for that purpose and execute it, found difficult to accept. Even if there were no victories for his movement at that point, he may have continued with MGM simply as proof he would not admit defeat.
That said, the purpose of this article is not to provide a sloppy interpretation of the trajectory of Aniwa Jun's life. Why did a man, with enough talent to make a living as a professional critic focused on manga, continue to maintain his position as a 'doujin', which has become synonymous with amateurs, until the bitter end in addition to his real job?
As someone who once shared activities in 'Labyrinth' with him, I would like to rethink what is manga doujin after my bereavement.
Despite calling it manga doujin, Aniwa Jun continued to be particular about 'original doujin', although they are grouped under the same term 'doujin', they are the exact opposite of fans (fanciers) such as cosplayers and fan-artists, who identify themselves as fans and try to immerse themselves in another's work. In contrast to those satisfied with being the recipients of things based on a work, original doujin create their own works.
However, contrary to the positive nuance the word 'original work' conveys, it's not easy to actually create and continue to create (mostly story) manga in the position of an amateur. 'Manga' is something everyone has drawn in a notebook at least once in their elementary school days, but because the individual needs to be responsible for everything (characters, objects, backgrounds, dialogue), from the idea and composition of the story to the writing of the panel art, the amount of work involved requires an extraordinary amount of energy to draw in earnest. Of course, the amount of work required varies greatly from person to person depending on the length of the story, drawing style, drawing speed, and so on. So, I'm only speaking in general terms here, but even if it's considered a hobby, working on and completing a work of several to a dozen pages (or more) is a high hurdle to incorporate into daily life.
What's more, just because manga is like that doesn't mean it was like that from the beginning. It wasn't until the Taisho period that the expression 'story manga' (originating from the West) took hold in Japan, and works from that time consisted mostly of short stories and simple illustrations, the gap between this and modern manga is like the gap between the mud and the clouds. The manga we know today is the result of postwar mangaka, including Tezuka Osamu (手塚治虫), but broadly speaking, their works, which were widely distributed as products, shaped the style and image of today's 'elaborate and diligently drawn' manga. The manga drawn by doujins are basically modelled after those commercial works, and artists and readers say 'if you don't draw something similar to that, it won't be recognised as manga', the assumption on both sides raises the hurdle for manga creation. And with this hurdle that has been raised to be as high as possible, it can be said there is a clear distinction between doujin (amateurs) and professionals when it comes to artists (I will not dwell on the fact that currently, the distinction between pro and doujin has become blurred).
In other words, only those, who can spend the enormous amount of effort and time required to write and draw a work in their 'everyday lives', are qualified to become professionals as they are capable of writing and drawing 'long-length' and 'serialised' works. There are many other conditions to become a professional, but the basic premise is that 'you must sacrifice time from other aspects of your life' to draw manga. If manga is your 'job', that's only natural, but instead, the work is required to become a 'product', they're also required to follow the guidance of an editor to improve their marketability. If a conflict occurs between the artist and editor at this time, the so-called 'cruel story of a mangaka' may begin, but if I were to say this is good or bad, it would deviate from the thread of my story, so I'll go ahead and put it aside here.
What's important is to draw manga on a daily basis, this means that works that greatly determine the image of 'manga' are created by professional artists who have bet their lives on them, for manga that maintains the level as a 'product' and is mass-produced (although there are many commercial works that do not), what sort of originality do non-professional doujin works possess?
Doujin who have real jobs, such as students and salarymen, are naturally unable to spend a large amount of effort and time drawing works in their 'everyday lives'. In other words, there's no way original doujin can compete with professionals from the beginning in terms of the 'quantity' of the manuscripts they produce. Furthermore, compared to professional artists who bet their lives drawing their works, it's inevitable they would be less motivated to complete them.
If you'll forgive my digression, doujin artists (including fan creations), mainly from the university generation, have appeared and vanished one after the other, what supports the activities of doujinshi exhibition and sale events are students who have the extra time that makes it possible to draw a large 'quantity' of manuscripts, and it's because they possess youth as a substitute for spirit. In the extreme, any original doujin can take on the challenge of drawing a full-fledged manga, but only during their university years. However, most of these are transient, and it's said the momentary momentum of them appearing one after another is a major factor in turning Comiket into a festival.
Let's return to the topic.
So, back then, most original doujin were in the professional artist reserve army, and if they weren't prepared to risk their lives, manga wasn't something they continued drawing after they graduated from high school or university. If they were to continue drawing, even if they join a doujin, they would have no choice but to immerse themselves in the solitary work in an isolated Circle (of course, that doesn't mean there aren't exceptions).
So in this period, those who want to draw manga seriously have no choice but to aim to become professional artists. To that extent, the work becomes a commercial work (entertainment), and in contrast, the uniqueness of doujin work was never questioned. No, before even that, there was no place for original doujin itself besides amateurs who are 'less than' professional.
However, with the advent of magazines such as 'COM', whose purpose was to explore the possibilities of manga, manga came to be seen not only as entertainment, but also as a means of self-expression, readers began to voice the idea doujin works should pursue their own unique possibilities. From their point of view, original doujin are those who purely pursue the possibilities of manga, regardless of whether or not it has commercial value.
Doujinshi are things created to pursue such purposes, apart from becoming a professional artist, the trend of continuing to be involved in manga creation as a doujin began around this time. 'Comic Market' was also created as a place to support such original doujin, and in its early days, it tried to maintain this attitude while accepting fan clubs and derivative work Circles.
After the birth of Comiket, the environment surrounding original doujin changed completely due to the spread of doujinshi exhibition and sale events. Apart from the system of publishers and distributors that connect artists and readers, exhibition and sale events (and doujinshi specialty stores) have come to connect creators and recipients, creating a cycle in which it's common for original doujin to become artists (rather than professionals or amateurs).
However, amidst the success of the doujin exhibition and sale events, from fan clubs to derivative work Circles, where even cosplayers flock to the event, it's a fact original doujin remain in the minority; the scheme of 'Labyrinth', who planned the creation of a doujinshi exhibition and sale event, overlooked its most important aspect.
The reason was the high hurdle of work creation I mentioned earlier, if you model it after manga that has been built up into a product, of course there's no way a doujin, who is less than a professional in quality of work and spirit, will be able to draw anything better than that (although this is not to say there aren't exceptions).
So, it's logical original doujin Circles have not increased as much as was desired (few doujin challenged original works), and speaking of works, original doujin departed from the genres that commercial works show with dramatic volume and were able to distinguish themselves from professional artists by publishing small works, such as essay comics, short stories, and illustration collections.
Fan clubs and derivative work Circles, made up of fans of commercial works, like cosplayers, can be said to have filled in the gaps in the genres of works they developed, and original doujin came to function as amateur artists who complemented publishers.
While not much, original doujin, who were aiming to break away from the 'manga industry' where publishers are at the top, firmly integrated into the industry.
Even in 'Comic Market', though it appeared by setting up 'business booths', we've been incorporated into the 'business world', the fact most participating Circles are made up of derivative work Circles and fan clubs means they have become part of the industry, and 'Comitia' (コミティア), which claims to be an exhibition and sale event for 'independent productions' rather than 'original works', is also looking for a way to survive by integrating with the industry, such as by incorporating a dispatched editorial department. Of course, I'm not blaming them as they are one part of doujinshi exhibition and sale events.
As far as original doujin go, no matter how hard they try, them being unable to stand up against an industry dominated by publishers stems from the uniqueness in the expression of 'manga' (though it's a commercial work), which actually has a high hurdle to complete, so they're doing other things such as essay comics that can be drawn with one hand (of course, there are excellent works as well) while stirring a cup of tea with the other to avoid this, so the question becomes is it possible for doujin to do anything other than that?
However, since professional artists dedicate their 'daily lives' to manga, so unless you are able to maintain your real job and other daily activities while still drawing works that aren't drawn by professionals (or are equal to or better than professionals), there's no point in being an original doujin. I believe Aniwa Jun viewed original doujin in this way, encouraging them to execute this by hosting MGM and speaking to them himself. 'Show us in the form of your work' a world that can only be depicted in original doujin.
However, due to the high hurdles faced in the expression of what is called manga, these attempts lost momentum over the years. He died without being able to establish a method that could compete with the spirit and production quantity of professional artists. He eventually began serialising 'Let Us Improve Through Everyone!!' (みんなでうまくなろうやんけ!!) in the 'MGM Newspaper' published by MGM. When the organiser of the exhibition and sale event himself has no choice but to instruct the original doujin participants in how to create stories, how desperate must he have been to be cornered to that extent?
Nevertheless, by holding MGM events over and over, Aniwa Jun incorporated doujinshi exhibition and sale events into his 'everyday life' and was able to see it through to the end. Rather than dedicating his daily life to manga, he made his existence akin to manga and made it compatible with his everyday life. It is true if you dedicate your everyday life to manga and become a professional artist, you may not be able to follow in the footsteps of doujin artists, but there is a way to develop worlds and new works while following the 'quantity' and spirit of doujin, right? It can be said he continued to be a doujin who faced manga on equal footing, looking for a way to do so while other doujin chose the path of derivative works to follow the work they loved rather than pursue the difficulties of original work.
And as I wrote at the very beginning, doujin are those who put themselves in 'human relationships that are connected through manga'. Drawing manga is a solitary task, but through doujin, it's possible to connect with those who likewise create. Even so, the purpose is not to connect, but to walk together and move forward together. What is the meaning and real charm in doujin besides sharing such a forward-looking gaze? On the contrary, they can connect only by looking forward; if they stay where they were and become afraid of change, they would likely be acquaintances rather than doujin.
Original doujin are people who can consciously share the work of drawing manga, which normally cannot be shared. The sense of camaraderie professional artists share with each other is naturally different. That's why I believe even I wanted to be in a doujin, and I'm sure Aniwa Jun was the same, or had feelings close to such. Facing forward with doujin in 'everyday life', aiming for a new world of manga that can be seen by walking, we still cannot stop walking.
Illustration: Sangatsukan (三月館) (Wiki)
Circle Name of the illustrator Saegusa Jun (さえぐさ じゅん).
Next up will be 3 short interviews with Gotou Kasumi, Kazuna Kei, and Nakajima Fumio by an artist called Ohyo back in 2022. Out of these 3, I think Kazuna Kei has had the most profound influence on early western anime fans, since he's the one who did the character designs and art for the Cream Lemon anime titles that were localised into English back in the 1980s. Kazuna has been on the internet for as long as I can remember, and I've always found him to be an incredibly interesting artist with interesting stories (if Elon Musk deletes Kazuna Kei's twitter account, that would be the gravest of travesties for researchers).