• If you're here for vtubers, I highly recommend you go to The Virtual Asylum instead.
    They'll love you there

Lolidrama What's the most pathetic/stupid anti loli argument you've ever came across?

haux

varishangout.com
Mine is:

"But lolicon is to pdos masturbate just like cp, so it's wrong"

"But what if a child sees it?"

"Minors feel unsafe with such representation!"

"You are contributing to the sufferement of CSA victims just like anyone watching cp is! Because if they see it they can get triggered and their sufferement will expand and therefore they will be victimized again."
 

OrmelloHowling

varishangout.com
That this
085.jpg

Suppose to be a child/loli.
 

PatioRama

varishangout.com
Regular
That ZUN wasn't a lolicon because he had a wife.

That having 'child porn' in your likes is okay because the person liking them is a minor.

A more 'universal' one that I've never got the reasoning of - if you ignore the ages of fictional characters you'll ignore them for real people. Is this some normalization/desensitization gobbledygook?
 

PatioRama

varishangout.com
Regular
A lot of this normalization stuff seemingly comes from Reddit NoFap shit. Many of them straight up talk about porn escalation. No actually good study has really managed to showcase the common point that taboo (see rape and incest as well) porn/erotica can erode your morals into thinking that stuff is okay IRL. Sometimes people just say "its common sense" which uh, it isn't? And something being "common sense"/"seemingly obvious" means jack shit. Common sense was/is often used to justify fucking Flat Earth lmao.

I'd bring up comparing this shit to propaganda is another dumb point but one people think is somehow intelligent. Propaganda only works on people who don't know better about what they're being feed BS about. People consuming incest porn know the topic is immoral IRL and no amount of porn watching will corrupt their morals or w/e.

A lot of arguments by these people fall under pseudo-intellectualism actually. "Drawing of what" is one entirely based on semantics. It doesn't make a difference if the drawing is of a fake apple or a fake person the drawing is still a drawing and not real. People will say calling it fictional/'just a drawing' is semantics too but in fact it DOES make a difference if a person is fictional. Fictional people aren't tangible in any real way, they don't have rights and can't be 'violated' like real people can. This is especially applicable to unrealistic anime designs. (if traits like eyeballs that take up a third of the skull and basically button noses were on real people they'd be grotesque) An idea/concept of something can't meaningfully be 'abused' like a sentient being can.
 
Last edited:

Agsisdoll

varishangout.com
one i seen goofy side she has small frame she must be loli short small brain or she has no bust so she must be a loli sort common num skulls out thare.
 

Taruby

varishangout.com
Regular
one i seen goofy side she has small frame she must be loli short small brain or she has no bust so she must be a loli sort common num skulls out thare.
I have a thread in the anime board where I've been translating articles regarding the history of Lolicon (Link). The thread has roughly 4~5 hours of translated reading material, not counting the hours spent visiting Japanese links and other Japanese resources to deepen your understanding or knowledge.

One thing I've been considering after seeing a couple users on this board say incorrect stuff with unwarranted certainty would be to create another thread that goes more into subject of what is and isn't a Loli with a test to get your Loli Expert Licence. Though I'm hesitant cause I'm personally grappling with edge cases regarding things I would consider to be proto-Loli like Betty Boop; she was used as an example explaining the concept of Lolicon in an illustrated article in the Fusion Product Lolicon Special Issue. It's easy to point to characters like Asahina Mikuru and say with certainty they are Loli, but it's another matter to say Disney's Snow White is a Loli; the latter, in my opinion, is merely important in understanding the things that would lead to Lolicon and would be useful only from an academic or scientific perspective.
 
Last edited:

Exoskull Zero RX-78-2

varishangout.com
Regular
I still find people arguing that Rebecca and Tatsumaki can't be Loli's because petite women exist
despite their creators stating otherwise.
 

Torment

varishangout.com
Regular
"It's not real CP so that makes it worst, I can't masturbate to that" - Vaush, notorious Horsecock lover
Vaush its a fucking joke, mf says that who likes loli or vtubers are pedos, but at the same time, he advocate for the legalization of cp

After the pikamee incident, traush, said this shit about vtubers


But this is what he has to say about "CP"


 

Tsuki

varishangout.com
The age old "It's the body of a child" one. Not a new argument by any means but it's still one of the stupidest. Especially when they end up having likes of underage characters but it's okay because "they LOOK like an adult".

If they see lolis as cp, drawn or not, then wouldn't what they do be cp? I mean, imagine fucking someone that, even though is clearly known to be underage, doesn't LOOK underage, and then explaining that to the cops.
 

PatioRama

varishangout.com
Regular
The age old "It's the body of a child" one. Not a new argument by any means but it's still one of the stupidest. Especially when they end up having likes of underage characters but it's okay because "they LOOK like an adult".

If they see lolis as cp, drawn or not, then wouldn't what they do be cp? I mean, imagine fucking someone that, even though is clearly known to be underage, doesn't LOOK underage, and then explaining that to the cops.

As much as I'd give SOME of those guys who have like fucking Marin or pre-timeskip Yoko in their likes but bitch about lolicons being pdf files the benefit of the doubt because people into JK characters but personally dislike loli have always existed in the Western community, and that current year culture has just made it a norm to throw the term pedo like candy.

But as they're social media addicted zoomers the benefit of the doubt only extends so far.
 

ジエントP

varishangout.com
"Their colors are trans colors, well you know Nazi's love to appropriate art" - Vaush
I've been a victim of art theft from Trannies who subsequently kicked me from a country roleplaying website so this pisses me off. It goes directly against my own experience. "Cries out as it strikes you" is a succinct explanation of this two faced behavior. They have what's coming to them, they better start praying to god for forgiveness because I sure as hell won't. They act like they own a color scheme and all the fucking colors of the Rainbow, but take no mind to copying a image, slapping their gay flag shit on it, deleting the original image hosted, and then kicking the original author to prevent taking any action against them.
 
Top