• If you're here for vtubers, I highly recommend you go to The Virtual Asylum instead.
    They'll love you there

Discussion Is toddlercon out of limits?

Narbray

varishangout.com
Regular
ok I am going to give a little bit of my opinion on the matter

first pedophilia is diagnosed as a mental disorder, the problem is not that it is unethical or immoral as many people believe, the problem is that it is a disorder that can cause harm to both the victim and the patient himself, and as a disorder it is important that there are typical symptoms of a disorder such as invasive recurrent images, in the case of pedophilia can be a recurrent and uncontrollable sexual desire, only have sexual arousal with children under 11 years (in the case of pedo) and not interested in other people and more typical symptoms such as anxiety and all this can fall into a compulsive and impulsive attitude that can be dangerous.
This is why pedophilia is not just getting turned on in a moment maybe by some cp and then forget about it as if it was not important, these people will try to look for more videos or try to go further and target a possible victim by entering a dangerous course.

the reason i explained all this is to make you understand that there is no proof that consuming this content automatically makes you a sick person, there doesn't always have to be a relation and each person is different.

now taking this to toddlercon, objectively we understand that they are not sexually attractive nor should they be, they do not have developed sexual organs, they do not have a sexually attractive physique, they do not release pheromones, testosterone or any other similar shit, so in my humble opinion this can not be properly compared to lolis since their sexual attractiveness should be null, personally I would be a little worried about those who consume toddlercon, not because I think they are a danger or pedophiles, as I said above it is a mental disorder and if your mind starts to get stronger than you then you have a problem, but that is not the case with all toddlercon users (and the same applies to lolicons), what I would worry about them is that they have a little distorted what is sexually attractive and that could cause them problems in their life but not necessarily assaulting a baby.

now going to the subject I don't see a problem with consuming toddlercon drawings, mainly because it is not real and as I explained in another thread that I don't remember where it is in reality it is not so rare to feel excitement for things that may seem weird or immoral and art thanks to its visual narrative and things like that can make you feel exciting something that in reality would not cause the same effect, so I don't think it is so weird or crazy to get excited with a toddlercon drawing especially if we see how the drawing is composed.

to sum up all the shit I wrote here, I don't think it's bad to get excited with toddlercon drawings that are created with that intention unless it becomes a mental problem (the same applies to lolicon) however we can be sure that the people who do it are not very normal, but let's be honest, we lolicons are not very normal people either.
 

XKOJM-N6KDI-JFKDL

varishangout.com
I think it is better for pedo-mentals to jerk off with toddlercon drawings, so that they do not have any desire for actual children.
If you oppress them a lot, they might attack actual children.
 
Last edited:

b51de

varishangout.com
Questions like this should be considered subversive since they're obviously meant to challenge cunnykeks, pushing the line all the way to 17 years 364 days and 23 hours old (you sick fuck) if need be. They're not asked in good faith, especially by someone with a days-old account.
 

Hexasheep93

varishangout.com
Regular
Questions like this should be considered subversive since they're obviously meant to challenge cunnykeks, pushing the line all the way to 17 years 364 days and 23 hours old (you sick fuck) if need be. They're not asked in good faith, especially by someone with a days-old account.
Im going to be honest I read that like 3 times and I still do not understand what you are saying.
 

RikkaNoodles

varishangout.com
Regular
Patron of the Forums
Obviously, as long as a real baby isn't used as reference, toddlercon isn't "out of limits". It's a drawing. Who cares.

That said, it honestly makes me uncomfortable.
 

Mr. Freestyler Himself

varishangout.com
What does "off limits" mean in this case? Off limits to someone's (and probably most people here's) preferences, sure. But if you intend to mean a ban on it, then I would be against that.
 

ninja8tyu

varishangout.com
Regular
He said, some ill-intentioned people purposely bring toddlers into the conversation to slander someone who might like a girl who is a day away from being 18 years old.
yeah, that's a bad faith argument they like to push

doesn't affect me, because i genuinely do not give two shits what someone wanks off to.

if you wanna wank off to powerpuff girls getting railed by some hairy fat-ass bear of a man wearing a neon wig, pink dwarf beard, wearing a skirt, while a dolphin is in the background raping a decapitated baby's throat while her pussy is fucked by a puppy, go ahead.

should i feel like that at some level, media should be banned? should i feel that if something is disgusting enough, it's worth banning? because i genuinely don't.

i don't think it's an own to not be disgusted at something neither directed at you nor enforced to look at that carries little value in the grand scheme of anything aside from muh hurt feels
 

Agsisdoll

varishangout.com
toddlercon clients wise odd group even say hafe time have babysafe feltish or age play has times more time if not funny furrys fail into it. that i seen. how personal feeling be vary coassices of cleint of matter.other think its ctutisey sort deal. lot won't tend bug other for most part like keep quiet for most part.
 

Mans-Based-Innit

varishangout.com
yeah, that's a bad faith argument they like to push

doesn't affect me, because i genuinely do not give two shits what someone wanks off to.

if you wanna wank off to powerpuff girls getting railed by some hairy fat-ass bear of a man wearing a neon wig, pink dwarf beard, wearing a skirt, while a dolphin is in the background raping a decapitated baby's throat while her pussy is fucked by a puppy, go ahead.

should i feel like that at some level, media should be banned? should i feel that if something is disgusting enough, it's worth banning? because i genuinely don't.

i don't think it's an own to not be disgusted at something neither directed at you nor enforced to look at that carries little value in the grand scheme of anything aside from muh hurt feels
what does "TDD" stand for?
 

Hexasheep93

varishangout.com
Regular
I mean at the end of the day it's still fiction, but it's kind of harder to defend than lolicon JS.
I mean strictly speaking, one shouldnt need to defend fiction. To me is like asking someone to defend their preference for pineapple in pizza, its just a preference.

In practice I imagine that those that are into it should be aware that they are basically a niche of a niche of weirdos:shinobu_kaka:.
 

Torment

varishangout.com
Regular
I dont give a fuck if its a drawing or not. There is nothing sexual about "toddlercon". Its based on babies for fucks sakes.
 

Hexasheep93

varishangout.com
Regular
I dont give a fuck if its a drawing or not. There is nothing sexual about "toddlercon". Its based on babies for fucks sakes.
And feral furries are based on animals, and guro on murder and torture. As I said before fiction is fiction, as long as no real person or animal was involved. Its should be ok

You dont have to like it. I certainly dont, but I would not feel right if I defended one type of fiction but not another just because it makes me uncomfortable.
 
Top