'B-b-b-be reasonable and say I'm right' Lol, no. Get fucked, faggot, we aren't like you.I'm not an anti or whatever the fuck btw, but this side of the discourse has become insufferable with the fear of pedophilia, or rather the fear that it might at all me related to loli. Guys, be reasonable. Look at the subject matter being discussed and consider that maybe the overlap with pedophilia is real. It doesn't mean you're a pedophile, but some of the loli artists you like probably are.
It'd be convenient for you if I was a pedophile, but I'm just another lolicon. It's just that I've decided to think outside the mantra of "all pedophiles are evil and gross unlike us noble lolicons grrr". It was a bit uncomfortable to think about in the beginning but man it's not like we're normal and this sort of overlap just makes sense. Yes, be reasonable. What a lot of your are doing is just elaborate mental gymnastics.'B-b-b-be reasonable and say I'm right' Lol, no. Get fucked, faggot, we aren't like you.
Will enjoy seeing you on the news the day you get a hard drive check.
You say that like your status as a pedo is an hypothetical when you already exposed yourself by going down the checklist of 'I'm a pedo that feel lonely so I'll try to convince loli-fags that they are like me' talking points.It'd be convenient for you if I was a pedophile, but I'm just another lolicon. It's just that I've decided to think outside the mantra of "all pedophiles are evil and gross unlike us noble lolicons grrr". It was a bit uncomfortable to think about in the beginning but man it's not like we're normal and this sort of overlap just makes sense. Yes, be reasonable. What a lot of your are doing is just elaborate mental gymnastics.
Nice job picking up on a typo. I too have not only the pattern recognition but logical skills to see that though lolicons and pedophiles are distinct, that the overlap is real. You're engaging in heavy denial/cope to say that it isn't when this thread already has documentation of popular loli artists just, you know... Being open about their pedophilia? Idk what other evidence you need. i'd say I'm looking forwards to you seeing the light of reason but to judge from your behavior so far it's likely you'll just keep being a knucklehead living in Copetown.You say that like your status as a pedo is an hypothetical when you already exposed yourself by going down the checklist of 'I'm a pedo that feel lonely so I'll try to convince loli-fags that they are like me' talking points.
Pattern recognition isn't a mantra and you picked the wrong user to cry about 'muh group think!' when I think the two previous pages of crying about Shadman and that other artist were gay and pointless too.
No, there is no overlap between us, fuck off. Go back to twitter of you want MAP buddies.
Using your brain isn't 'mental gymnastics', it's called 'thinking', which you don't seem to be capable of since you don't know the difference between 'you' and 'your'.
Once again, will love seeing you on the news.
That's not what a typo is, dumbass, the fact it's the first point in your response tell me I did well to mention it. Must have hit a nerve.Nice job picking up on a typo. I too have not only the pattern recognition but logical skills to see that though lolicons and pedophiles are distinct, that the overlap is real. You're engaging in heavy denial/cope to say that it isn't when this thread already has documentation of popular loli artists just, you know... Being open about their pedophilia? Idk what other evidence you need. i'd say I'm looking forwards to you seeing the light of reason but to judge from your behavior so far it's likely you'll just keep being a knucklehead living in Copetown.
Actually pattern recognition is an innate ability mostly dictated by your IQ. Whatever, this is irrelevant. Clearly this is making you emotional so why don't you cool off and read what I've said again in the morning? Your talk about not being dogmatic could prove true then. Maybe. Heh.That's not what a typo is, dumbass, the fact it's the first point in your response tell me I did well to mention it. Must have hit a nerve.
Don't brag about having 'logical skills' while also excluding 'pattern recognition' from said skills, it expose you as a dumbass trying to sound smarter than he is. Just like you exposed yourself as a lonely pedo already.
There is no such things on this thread but there ARE exemple of your kind being in jail for diddling kids, you failed 'how do you do, fellow kids?' retard.
'C-c-c-c-copetown' Try again without the stuttering or the obvious anger and it MIGHT become a decent comeback.
Just saying you have proof or that you're right because 'it's obvious' doesn't actually make you right or make any proof appear out of thin air. And begging me to just agree with you isn't a good look either. Just a FYI.
'IQ is separated from logical skills' Oh my god, It took you almost half an hour to find a shovel to dig yourself that deep?Actually pattern recognition is an innate ability mostly dictated by your IQ. Whatever, this is irrelevant. Clearly this is making you emotional so why don't you cool off and read what I've said again in the morning? Your talk about not being dogmatic could prove true then. Maybe. Heh.
You're such a midwit it's unbearable. The tilting in the way you write is very obvious, but I'll give you some credit for actually trying to engage even if the attempts are pitiful non-arguments and cope.'IQ is separated from logical skills' Oh my god, It took you almost half an hour to find a shovel to dig yourself that deep?
It's crazy how you realized how dumb of a take that was so you tried to dismiss it as irrelevant but still posted it. Seems like I hit a nerve again.
'You said I was angry so I'll say you're emotional! T-t-t-t-that's a come back!' Lol. Lmao.
I read it, I understood it and I saw you're a retarded lonely pedo.
'P-p-p-p-please say I'm right or you're dogmatic with...all those people not talking on this thread right now' You keep digging and it keep being funny.
'S-s-s-see, I'm laughing, totally not mad' Ultimate sign of asshurt from an exposed pedo.
Actually, I am. Watch: I am not a pedophile, I'm a lolicon, though I'm obviously not as allergic to the idea that pedophiles can also be lolicons as the rest of you are. In being a lolicon, I am like you, actually. I've just seen past the pedo hysteria because the ultimate conclusion of that is me posturing against Comic LO and a bunch of artists I like because "they're pedos". Nah, fuck all that.at least you're not denying you're a pedo or insisting that we're like you anymore.
Yes, most people on both sides are losing the nuance in this topic. It's kind of what I'm trying to pry back in.The drama persists even in here. Anyways, I believe @cunny poster (baby come back) made a thread talking about this a while back that I was too drunk at the time to respond to properly. As for the claim of all artists reference somebody in real life... again depends on the artist. I doubt Inuboshi is referencing more than a book on how to draw moe characters (his characters have a very distinct, cartoony and bubbly look that's more reminiscent of shoujo manga, and I have many examples of such how-to books lying around in my sadpanda favorites), while Salad probably does occasionally glance out the window at the local playground, nods assuredly, and gets to work. There is very much a nuance to this thing, so being black & white about this either way risks being reductive.
'Y-y-y-you're such a dumb poo poo head meanie!!!!!' And yet you can't formulate a single sentence to defend your obvious pedo ass. We are not like you, we are not your friends and you are a disgusting pedo.You're such a midwit it's unbearable. The tilting in the way you write is very obvious, but I'll give you some credit for actually trying to engage even if the attempts are pitiful non-arguments and cope.
Actually, I am. Watch: I am not a pedophile, I'm a lolicon, though I'm obviously not as allergic to the idea that pedophiles can also be lolicons as the rest of you are. In being a lolicon, I am like you, actually. I've just seen past the pedo hysteria because the ultimate conclusion of that is me posturing against Comic LO and a bunch of artists I like because "they're pedos". Nah, fuck all that.
Better ban me if you want me to "fuck off", bozo. I've done nothing but argue in good faith and so far all you've offered in response is blatant denial, making shit up + random insults. Hopefully some better users will look at this thread tomorrow, I've wanted to talk about this with someone with at least half a brain about this for a while and homie you're not it.'Y-y-y-you're such a dumb poo poo head meanie!!!!!' And yet you can't formulate a single sentence to defend your obvious pedo ass. We are not like you, we are not your friends and you are a disgusting pedo.
'S-s-s-s-see you laughed at my anger so I'll say you're mad!!! T-t-t-that make me save face!!!' Lol. Lmao.
Too late, you already admitted it, pedo and no, still not the same. Your delusion that because pedos breath air, everyone who breath air has 'overlaps' with pedos will never make us like you.
It's too late to try and pull the 'how do you do, fellow lolicon?' act again, pedo.
It's hilarious how angry and desperate you are. You were literally checking the thread every few minutes without responding until someone gave you something vaguely resembling some backup. Only then did jump in to get slapped around some more.
Nah, the ultimate conclusion of that is Loli being fine while you end up on the news as a pedo like every faggots who used your pre-made talking points.
So once again, let's be extremely clear and accurate: There is no nuance, you are a pedo and we are not like you in the slightest. Not in any way, shape or form. Your retarded attempt at infiltration failed and you can go cry to your MAP friends on twitter now. And you're not 'prying' anything back in, fuck off.
I'm not a mod, retard and why would I ban you just for being retarded? Not everyone is like you and will throw a tantrum just because someone disagree with them. Only antis like you and those who parrots the same talking points do that.Better ban me if you want me to "fuck off", bozo. I've done nothing but argue in good faith and so far all you've offered in response is blatant denial, making shit + random insults. Hopefully some better users will look at this thread tomorrow, I've wanted to talk about this with someone with at least half a brain about this for a while and home you're not it.
and on the people spewing shit about loli and its relation to pedo shit just see one of my many posts on this forum about abstraction as I don't feel like repeating myself. are there pedos both making and enjoying loli? sure. just like there are pedos making movies, games, books, and all kinds of media you like. pedos are fucken everywhere, you may or may not have come face to face with one IRL and you would never know. so there is no need to state the blatantly fucken obvious unless you are an anti trying to use it as some kind of gotcha, unless we got proof they doing crimes I don't fucken care
Oh I've got no problem with them being pedos, I'm not even sure why you're bringing the other stuff up. Just because they're pedophiles it doesn't mean they're involved in criminal activities, I don't know a single place on Earth where just being a pedophile lands you in jail. This is what I mean when I say you got 0 nuance. I'm not "hellbent on connecting the two" I just think saying loli has nothing to do with pedophilia is frankly a silly statement and it's creating a wave of annoying ironic lolicons that are gasping for air once they realize that some artists and publications are like the pedos that are supposed to be their (mortal) enemies!I love how the last part of my rant was completely fucken ignored
LiterallyRichter you are not fucken smart pointing out that some lolicons/loli artists CAN be pedos, it's not "nuanced" to point out the blatantly fucken obvious. ofc there are prob some loli artists out there who are pedos. but unless you show me some fucken proof of them going after real kids or being in the possession of real CP then shut the fuck up and fuck off. no one is impressed with this bullshit. it's just fucken annoying as lolicons want to distance themselves from real fucken pedos who do real fucken crimes but you seem hell-bent on connecting the two. and for what? so you can seem big brain on the internet it seems like based on how you post
the fact of the matter is this you don't have to be a pedo to be into lolicon and some pedos are into lolicon are both true statements, and also being into lolicon does not make one a pedo. like I said I'm not gonna repeat what I've said before about being attracted to abstraction over reality. but it's very relevant here
now stop fucken double posting and go get a room (make your own fucken thread about this topic so you can shit in there)
what the fuck is miria doing on the forumit's creating a wave of annoying ironic lolicons
This has been slang on 4chan before Nil ever became infamous on lolicon twitter. Please. All of these arguments have been had before.what the fuck is miria doing on the forum
Oh I've got no problem with them being pedos, I'm not even sure why you're bringing the other stuff up. Just because they're pedophiles it doesn't mean they're involved in criminal activities, I don't know a single place on Earth where just being a pedophile lands you in jail. This is what I mean when I say you got 0 nuance. I'm not "hellbent on connecting the two" I just think saying loli has nothing to do with pedophilia is frankly a silly statement and it's creating a wave of annoying ironic lolicons that are gasping for air once they realize that some artists and publications are like the pedos that are supposed to be their (mortal) enemies!
Which begs the question, why? Why do you care what a bunch of people in an obscure ass forum thinks about the subject? If you're just trying to get a laugh, I'll understand, but what's the endgoal of saying shit basically everyone already knows? Not being hostile I'm legit curious the rationale here because, I'll be honest, I'm legit surprised how much attention this place gets compared to its relative lack of activity or interesting posts.It's kind of what I'm trying to pry back in.