Megathread Lolidrama

1708194973783.png

here's a horse fucker
 
reminder this is the same dude who enjoy watching deep web's video
pretty much

i've mentioned this in this megathread and other places, but again, people who bitch about lolis are 100% guaranteed to be morally bankrupt lmao

nigga 100% has cheese pizza on one of his hard drives from some dark web source he ain't publicly flaunting like the other shit he does
 
Richard Masucci from ReviewTechUSA: Attacking Sony's censorship policies, which people were trying to strawman others into thinking it "only targets loli content" when it wasn't just that. One of the big examples he listed in that video was Blue Reflection. His recent take about Vaush and loli content is questionable.
LOL! Grifters Gonna Grift!
1708368107245.png

1708368118678.png

 
People I'm waiting for some evidence to drop on:
Add MeatCanyon/Papa Meat to the list of these people.

This is straight coal coming from the same guy that animated Rigby getting molested by Benson, and that follows a loli VTuber.


So it looks like he was following a loli vtuber, who he collaborated with, just to then unfollow, because he knows it would look bad on his image.

He also has pictures of naked babies in his likes:

This comment talking about the Ben 10 thing might be worth investigating:
1708563818057.png

The most that I can see is that he did a Ben 10 animation where there was an insinutaion that Ben and Gwen were fucking, and a joke about Ben's penis being like a 50 year olds, which is extremely questionable given his own line of logic.
 
Last edited:
I'm honestly considering that Meat is just trolling XD standing in front of a bookshelf full of manga & showing clips and anime containing the stuff he deems so very close to CP is peak comedy.

If he's genuine about this whole video then it's just sad..

"Bottom Line: Never expose yourself to those things because it'll turn you into a pedo"
- person who researched those things in detail to make a video about it, exposing everyone to it as well in the process

But yeah, here's me hoping it's just a big troll x3
 
"Just trolling" is the same as "this is my real opinion" when it concerns loli. I'm not going to trust anyone going from "it's just drawings leave it alone" to "this should be banned lol I'm joking but not really but I am!".

flashgitz and meatcanyon pulled this "anime is for pedos" shit too often for me to believe they were just joking.
 
"Just trolling" is the same as "this is my real opinion" when it concerns loli. I'm not going to trust anyone going from "it's just drawings leave it alone" to "this should be banned lol I'm joking but not really but I am!".

flashgitz and meatcanyon pulled this "anime is for pedos" shit too often for me to believe they were just joking.
It's just people that like to have their cake and eat it to in regards to fanbases. There are people who do this freedom of speech grift and then you find out they only like it when it is their kind of free speech and brigade users off of the site. People that are ironic do not deserve to be a voice for anything. It's just insecurity and those that will run at the drop of a hat.
 
On one hand it's obvious, that most of these people do it for the grift. It's currently popular to both shit on lolicon and on anime in general. Tourism has reached critical mass, to the point where it becomes profitable to incite drama. Because of that I wouldn't necessary jump on the "they have something to hide" bandwagon.
On the other hand though. Meat did just recently say he wanted to get away from drama, just to come out with this. This just feels like he wants to add some weights to his moral scale to prevent some nearing fallout that is about to happen. I wouldn't be surprised if some DMs of his leak with some damming stuff.

Also some of the comments under the video defending him are hilariously similar to the shit everyone else always says. "His sexualizing of under-aged characters is satire!", "There is nothing wrong with making fun of the Brady situation", "His characters don't look like children", etc.

On a different note. Why is it always the people who are against loli who bring up the "She's a 800 year old vampire / dragon" defense? I haven't heard/read that from anyone defending loli in a decade. The current thing people are saying ("It's a fictional character", "It's a drawing", etc) is almost never brought up. Almost like it would show just how focused these people are on seeing real children in anything sexual.
 
Well it was never a good defense since it plays into the idea that the ages of fictional characters matter.
and it was a joke, it doesn't make it look better

no one likes to explain jokes, but that's quite literally it

"officer, i swear! she's only 500 years old!" is the frame
"sure as fuck doesn't look like it" is the telling
the loli agreeing and/or proving that is the case, the guy believing it anyway, and so on is the punchline

is how this usually goes, but for some reason, the website that banned porn allegedly because of a massive problem with child (real) rape and explicit content weren't so keen on letting others use it in real life

considering how much tumblrites think they can be the opposite gender so badly, i can imagine them playing out scenarios in their favorite fictions in real life didn't turn out so hot

pretty sure it was tumblr that spawned the girls from the slenderman stabbings at the time as well
 
The frustrating thing about that strawman is when people try to explain the trope its talking about as a legal/moral loophole on the behalf of the creators somehow, when damn near every series that uses that trope also sexualizes actually "underaged" characters.

Monogatari and Dragon Maid have both lolibaba and actual loli/shouta characters, the lolibaba isn't there as a 'loophole'. Granted, expecting these people to actually do research into what they're talking about is a lost cause.

Dragon Maid being talked about as if its the anime equivalent of shit like When the Dead Go to Die is funny admittedly though that's only 'in a vacuum' so to speak.
 
The frustrating thing about that strawman is when people try to explain the trope its talking about as a legal/moral loophole on the behalf of the creators somehow, when damn near every series that uses that trope also sexualizes actually "underaged" characters.

Monogatari and Dragon Maid have both lolibaba and actual loli/shouta characters, the lolibaba isn't there as a 'loophole'. Granted, expecting these people to actually do research into what they're talking about is a lost cause.

Dragon Maid being talked about as if its the anime equivalent of shit like When the Dead Go to Die is funny admittedly though that's only 'in a vacuum' so to speak.
I think the problem is trying to justify fiction through the lense of reality with plausible deniability of age. Rather than explaining that Fiction is just Fiction as a whole and it's all based on people's fantasies, exploration of sexual scenarios, and fetishes. The worst is when we also hear that fiction effects reality, when that is only if you are immature to not understand the difference between fiction and reality itself. Because think about it, there is loads of erotica from novels, books, and even porn productions about rape, incest, even underage scenarios, far worse than anything Japan could ever produce, i highly doubt anyone is going out there and performing all of these said actions after consuming these types of things. But you can bet those who criticize it will, because they are projecting their own issues into the public, and 10/10 they have more skeletons in their closet and deep seeded issues even those irony types that i am starting to notice from the examples are using it to justify and draw real people and actual CP. Not fictional characters that do not even exist which is the opposite scenario.

I can agree with that on the Monogatari and Dragon Maid example, this only makes sense if they were based on real people and they were underage. Which is what the whole thing hinges on which obviously they are not, if it was Japanese Laws would come down hard on them for it because it's illegal to do anyways. Even American laws are like this. Those that keep saying this have problems and mental issues that they need to work out as a whole. I will never forget how weird these types used an image of an actual baby as an example and edited a weird looking child and compared it to Uzaki-Chan when literally Uzaki Chan looks nothing like any child i have ever seen and it really blew my mind on how they look at characters and see them as real life children vs us who just see them as fictional characters and an image on a page.

Apparently, MeatCanyon deleted the Tom Brady video. Someone has a guilty conscience (or something to hide):

They always do, i mean they are drawing real people and real children. Which is ironic in of itself.
 
flashgitz and meatcanyon pulled this "anime is for pedos" shit too often for me to believe they were just joking.
And it's pretty clear that neither of them actually care about anime, so why idiots (mostly terminally online right-wing or left-wing losers radicalized by bot accounts, or grifters) put much weight into his clearly half-assed opinion is puzzling.
1708806036196.png
 
Back
Top