i'm just hoping that anti gets arrested for restributing that shit
-
If you're here for vtubers, I highly recommend you go to The Virtual Asylum instead.
They'll love you there
That would be a cherry on top right there.
"Pedophile by law", what the hell are you on about? The law isn't going to give you some kind of badge because you've possessed or distributed child pornography, maybe you mean you'll be declared a sexual offender, by being put on the sexual offender registry.
Anyway, it's not likely that there will be repercussions for this, from what I heard since I didn't see the picture, there's no way they can declare that to be CP. Was there even underwear showing? It has to be sexually explicit and it has to have at least some nudity.
What can happen though, is that they find more than that when they talk to Dicey. That, for example, can easily happen considering they have a relationship.
From my understanding, there were pictures showing underwear with the implications of more explicit pictures shared privately. And yes, that's what I meant by "pedophile by law", both would be put on the sex offenders list, one for distribution of child porn (which is what happened to my cousin) and the other for possession of child porn. The feds don't give a shit about your reasoning, they'll have local law enforcement show up with a warrant and arrest the individual and confiscate the computer/phone. Even if nothing ends up being found, you still have the repercussions of your family finding out and having to deal with police.
Those that think the sex offenders list isn't that big of a deal don't realize that everyone will automatically assume you're a pedophile once they find out. It truly doesn't matter what your explanation is, they'll always think you're a pedophile. Now I personally don't think dumbass teenager shit should ever put you on that list, but again, feds don't care.
man, ever since you let me know that kiwifarms crossposted my stuff, i check on that megathread from time to time now whenever i go to this forum to see the reactions lol
looks like one of my other posts also got added recently from that "doxxer" brat
Thread
which i find neat
that is already another level of mental retard
It better get help fast before it's too late
once again showing their inability to use their brain and misinformation, that person probably doesn't even know what pedopphilia is
Forget about using social media, these people shouldn't even have the right to vote.
Shooting guns wasn't enough one day, and so the heavy began his journey to shoot loads in kids.
Tweet || Archive
Tweet || Archive
The dude went from having a PhD in Psychology from Twitter University, to being a Moral Arbiter, to having a PhD in Law from Twitter University, to a Moral Arbiter again.
My Categories of Anti Arguments remains as descriptive as it always has.
Tweet || Archive
Tweet || Archive
The dude went from having a PhD in Psychology from Twitter University, to being a Moral Arbiter, to having a PhD in Law from Twitter University, to a Moral Arbiter again.
My Categories of Anti Arguments remains as descriptive as it always has.
This is fucking hilarious, I hate the whole "both left wing/right wing are the same in the end", it's not that, it's PEOPLE, people are the same when it comes to "moral issues" ESPECIALLY regarding something important, like children.
So you always see this irrational response because a lot of people can't hold back, they MUST protect what they think are children.
What a stupid talk about dopamine, if these people knew that dopamine is produced by any stupidity.
This is what happens when stupid people with IQ of -100 get talking about science stuff, I think instead of trying to convince these people on the subject about loli, we should concentrate our forces on preventing them from reproducing.
I come across people who research scientific topics only to end up understanding things less than at first. Then they go through the networks becoming those who know a lot about science just because they read 3 shits in google and they are unable to understand what they read themselves.
> we should concentrate our forces on preventing them from reproducingWhat a stupid talk about dopamine, if these people knew that dopamine is produced by any stupidity.
This is what happens when stupid people with IQ of -100 get talking about science stuff, I think instead of trying to convince these people on the subject about loli, we should concentrate our forces on preventing them from reproducing.
I come across people who research scientific topics only to end up understanding things less than at first. Then they go through the networks becoming those who know a lot about science just because they read 3 shits in google and they are unable to understand what they read themselves.
No worries. A giant % of those retards are dick choppers. Thank god those mentally defective retards can't breed. They put an end to their own bloodline WITH THEIR FREE WILL. Trannies only musn't be allowed to adopt kids, so their sick Troomer fetishes and dick chopping habits die with them and are not groomed and pushed onto other people
Attachments
damn bruh you're right, I'll sleep easier after this.
Grönsak
varishangout.com
I read this and thought about where I should move this post. Then I read on. and It made me want to facepalm harder than usual.
I didn't think that would make my post appear to be me being horny for booba instead of it being lolidrama
I just put that there as a joke lmao
so .. I proceed to retweet
And this is why anime should never have become so popular, if these idiots did not know MHA they would never have imagined their age, also age is stupid anyway, these people have totally distorted the concept of CP and pedophilia.
Daily Bullshit #12
Seen in Context
Tweet || Archive
As usual, Antis are subhuman.
I don't mean that as an insult, as usual, because they continuously demonstrate that they're incapable of humanity.
They're by definition subhuman, and it's something they chose to by by throwing away their humanity.
Tweet || Archive
Given the fact that I literally recorded an event on here where an Anti actually redistributed CSEM and thought it was fine because "hurr durr it's okay when I do it because I point out how wrong it is," I'm not really finding this amusing as I used to.
It's wrong to redistribute CSEM under any circumstance because it harms the child in it.
But drawings do not exist, and thus do not have the capacity to feel, and can't be harmed.
The actual situation here isn't a crime, because the Anti has not posted CSEM like the previous one I had recorded did.
However, the fact that 1) She considered the drawing to depict a child, and 2) Had no problems reposting what she considered to be by definition CSEM, suggests a huge problem.
By 'huge problem', I mean the fact that she's probably just a pedophile projecting and wants to use this excuse to redistribute any CSEM on her drive on the open web, of which Twitter is a great platform that groomers and child rapists use to distribute.
My source? The case where pedophiles used certain hashtags to covertly send each other CSEM via Mega, and the fact that Jack said CSEM isn't against TOS after many complaints.
Within the tactics and strategies criminals use, they're incredibly stupid and predictable, hence why I'll pull a Mycroft and simply claim as fact that Twitter is a great platform for groomers on simple inductions.
And within my experience dealing with Antis, they'll more than justify their grooming of kids on Twitter by bashing on the lolis.
Their thought process is such:
This continues from the caption tweet.
Tweet || Archive
This is generally why I don't bother arguing with Antis anymore, and honestly, I'd advise others to stop as well.
It's a pointless endeavor.
Debates require civility, rationality, and sportsmanship.
Regardless of whether you have those thing or not, Antis do not possess the ability to make those traits.
As such, even a regular discussion is fundamentally impossible, and it shouldn't even to be attempted even if possible.
Taking them seriously is why they've become a huge problem in the first place.
They don't deserve to be treated with respect, dignity, or seriousness.
And we can have discussions on the nuances on these types of things and topics without having to hear or deal with idiots.
Discussions can only be had without idiots.
Given her bio, with the Tumblr-esque font and introduction style, I'm a bit inclined to believe that she's a groomer.
I seriously doubt her brain has developed past 4 years old, and I even moreso doubt she should be considered a sane adult if of age.
There's more correlation to being a toxic Tumblr user who moved to Twitter crusading against Antis being a child rapist than jerking off to drawings.
But I digress.
I really don't have much to say other than how pathetic she looks.
Want to make that seem just that much more pathetic?
A pathetic, lonely person, trying to roleplay, but no one answers her calls.
Maybe this is her way of finally getting attention and love.
But I say that not as to empathize with her, but to describe just how pitiful this thing is.
Threads I've Done:
Awesome Groomer Facts** || Fought Nazis** || Fought Racists** || Daily Bullshit 2
Daily Bullshit 3 || Daily Bullshit 4* || Cartoon Chris Hansen || Daily Bullshit 5
Daily Bullshit 6 || Daily Bullshit 7** || Daily Bullshit 8 || Daily Bullshit 9
Daily Bullshit 10** || Daily Bullshit 10.5** || Daily Bullshit 11 || (You are here)
Daily Bullshit 13 ||
*Anti-Argument Categories; I did a little categorization of arguments and tactics Antis like to use when arguing against lolicon media in that thread, but those arguments also slightly applies to other forms of media Antis consider "problematic," so I marked it with an asterisk just in case people find it useful or important.
**Mainly Archival/Lack of Explanations; Daily Bullshit started mainly to show the daily bullshit lolicons and in general anyone who likes "problematic media" have to deal with by showing examples of harassment. The explanations I added about basic ethical theories, psychological observations, and legal information to explain why they're obviously wrong ended up being my gimmick in these threads, and aren't actually supposed to be the usual. But fate had it such that this is what I do now. Yay.
Seen in Context
Tweet || Archive
As usual, Antis are subhuman.
I don't mean that as an insult, as usual, because they continuously demonstrate that they're incapable of humanity.
They're by definition subhuman, and it's something they chose to by by throwing away their humanity.
Tweet || Archive
Given the fact that I literally recorded an event on here where an Anti actually redistributed CSEM and thought it was fine because "hurr durr it's okay when I do it because I point out how wrong it is," I'm not really finding this amusing as I used to.
It's wrong to redistribute CSEM under any circumstance because it harms the child in it.
But drawings do not exist, and thus do not have the capacity to feel, and can't be harmed.
The actual situation here isn't a crime, because the Anti has not posted CSEM like the previous one I had recorded did.
However, the fact that 1) She considered the drawing to depict a child, and 2) Had no problems reposting what she considered to be by definition CSEM, suggests a huge problem.
By 'huge problem', I mean the fact that she's probably just a pedophile projecting and wants to use this excuse to redistribute any CSEM on her drive on the open web, of which Twitter is a great platform that groomers and child rapists use to distribute.
My source? The case where pedophiles used certain hashtags to covertly send each other CSEM via Mega, and the fact that Jack said CSEM isn't against TOS after many complaints.
Within the tactics and strategies criminals use, they're incredibly stupid and predictable, hence why I'll pull a Mycroft and simply claim as fact that Twitter is a great platform for groomers on simple inductions.
And within my experience dealing with Antis, they'll more than justify their grooming of kids on Twitter by bashing on the lolis.
Their thought process is such:
- If child rape isn't okay, then Lolicon shouldn't be okay.
- If Lolicon is okay, then child rape should be okay.
This continues from the caption tweet.
Tweet || Archive
This is generally why I don't bother arguing with Antis anymore, and honestly, I'd advise others to stop as well.
It's a pointless endeavor.
Debates require civility, rationality, and sportsmanship.
Regardless of whether you have those thing or not, Antis do not possess the ability to make those traits.
As such, even a regular discussion is fundamentally impossible, and it shouldn't even to be attempted even if possible.
Taking them seriously is why they've become a huge problem in the first place.
They don't deserve to be treated with respect, dignity, or seriousness.
And we can have discussions on the nuances on these types of things and topics without having to hear or deal with idiots.
Discussions can only be had without idiots.
Given her bio, with the Tumblr-esque font and introduction style, I'm a bit inclined to believe that she's a groomer.
I seriously doubt her brain has developed past 4 years old, and I even moreso doubt she should be considered a sane adult if of age.
There's more correlation to being a toxic Tumblr user who moved to Twitter crusading against Antis being a child rapist than jerking off to drawings.
But I digress.
Want to make that seem just that much more pathetic?
Maybe this is her way of finally getting attention and love.
But I say that not as to empathize with her, but to describe just how pitiful this thing is.
Threads I've Done:
Awesome Groomer Facts** || Fought Nazis** || Fought Racists** || Daily Bullshit 2
Daily Bullshit 3 || Daily Bullshit 4* || Cartoon Chris Hansen || Daily Bullshit 5
Daily Bullshit 6 || Daily Bullshit 7** || Daily Bullshit 8 || Daily Bullshit 9
Daily Bullshit 10** || Daily Bullshit 10.5** || Daily Bullshit 11 || (You are here)
Daily Bullshit 13 ||
*Anti-Argument Categories; I did a little categorization of arguments and tactics Antis like to use when arguing against lolicon media in that thread, but those arguments also slightly applies to other forms of media Antis consider "problematic," so I marked it with an asterisk just in case people find it useful or important.
**Mainly Archival/Lack of Explanations; Daily Bullshit started mainly to show the daily bullshit lolicons and in general anyone who likes "problematic media" have to deal with by showing examples of harassment. The explanations I added about basic ethical theories, psychological observations, and legal information to explain why they're obviously wrong ended up being my gimmick in these threads, and aren't actually supposed to be the usual. But fate had it such that this is what I do now. Yay.
Last edited:
Grönsak
varishangout.com
This is just sad why are they even on twitter in the first place. But I don't expect much from someone claiming they have a tongue tattoo.
Which can be proven false with a quick image search.
Daily Bullshit #13
Oh hey, the unlucky prime.
I wake up to find a death threat to a bunch of people I know, so let's just archive everything.
Tweet || Archive (First Half)
Looks like this dude got a PhD in Psychology and Legality of things from Twitter University.
First off, grooming is still a crime, and it can be punished in varied ways, depending on various factors, including location.
Within respect to the United States, grooming can be fined, charged with at maximum 20 years, or both. [18 U.S.C. § 2422]
And it's slightly different in regards to federal crime and stuff and the methodology, so please do your research. [18 U.S.C. § 2425]
As for how psychology and the DSM-V defines and stuff, I've gone through it in previous threads.
But to summarize again:
Tweet || Archive (Second Half)
As you read through this thread, it's clear that this person thinks people can be minor-coded, and that attraction to those people is pedophilia.
That, and the last quote is rather proof and indication that this person is not as human as we know humans to be.
@GoromiBitch: "I don't care about it being morally wrong or not, I'm disgusted, and the fact you guys aren't makes you less than me"
That's what he essentially says.
So, I don't plan to give him any respect as a human being.
Tweet ||
Personally, I believe that everyone has the capacity to be moral, just, and good.
However, I've met many Antis before, and whether it's due to stubbornness, fear of group rejection/retaliation, brainwash, or whatever, it doesn't change the fact that they're needlessly cruel.
And honestly, I'm unable to see anyone who affiliates themselves as one as human.
They threw away their humanity.
I'm simply unable to find it again and give them it back.
Update: (2021-07-06)
Tweet || Archive
Well, he's still going on about how he's disgusted at the notion that lolicons like depictions of children and thus pedophilia under his eyes, which, no matter where this goes now, it doesn't really change how stupid he is.
By the way, what I tried to say was "From an angry person to the point of disgust" in Latin.
Which was rather quick to trigger him in seconds
Tweet || Archive
He's fine with getting fucked by dogs but drawings are a no-no.
My explanations are in my reply tweets.
Threads I've Done:
Awesome Groomer Facts** || Fought Nazis** || Fought Racists** || Daily Bullshit 2
Daily Bullshit 3 || Daily Bullshit 4* || Cartoon Chris Hansen || Daily Bullshit 5
Daily Bullshit 6 || Daily Bullshit 7** || Daily Bullshit 8 || Daily Bullshit 9
Daily Bullshit 10** || Daily Bullshit 10.5** || Daily Bullshit 11 || Daily Bullshit 12
(You are here) ||
*Anti-Argument Categories; I did a little categorization of arguments and tactics Antis like to use when arguing against lolicon media in that thread, but those arguments also slightly applies to other forms of media Antis consider "problematic," so I marked it with an asterisk just in case people find it useful or important.
**Mainly Archival/Lack of Explanations; Daily Bullshit started mainly to show the daily bullshit lolicons and in general anyone who likes "problematic media" have to deal with by showing examples of harassment. The explanations I added about basic ethical theories, psychological observations, and legal information to explain why they're obviously wrong ended up being my gimmick in these threads, and aren't actually supposed to be the usual. But fate had it such that this is what I do now. Yay.
Oh hey, the unlucky prime.
I wake up to find a death threat to a bunch of people I know, so let's just archive everything.
Looks like this dude got a PhD in Psychology and Legality of things from Twitter University.
First off, grooming is still a crime, and it can be punished in varied ways, depending on various factors, including location.
Within respect to the United States, grooming can be fined, charged with at maximum 20 years, or both. [18 U.S.C. § 2422]
And it's slightly different in regards to federal crime and stuff and the methodology, so please do your research. [18 U.S.C. § 2425]
As for how psychology and the DSM-V defines and stuff, I've gone through it in previous threads.
But to summarize again:
- The term, when it was conceived by Krafft-Ebing, did not include or consider the attraction to cartoons, nor the abstract notion of the childlike figure; Pedophilia was created to describe the real-world phenomenon of an adult raping kids, the sexual attraction of adults to real children.
- Although the term, if abstracted to contain the notion of sexual attraction not to children only, but to the childlike figure (which can be defined in various ways: age, height minor-coded lol, youthful appearance, etc), then the term itself cannot include by definition only child rapists and bad people, but also ordinary people, people who have done no wrong, and others who inadvertently fall into this category, and the meaning itself changes such that pedophiles aren't necessarily bad people.
Basically, it's like putting bakers and butchers into the category of murderer by changing its definition, and then pretending that it should hold the same moral weight and such behind the accusation. - Within the actual psychology and functionality of the brain, the brain can tell the difference between reality and fiction just fine, and makes a very good distinction between the two. There do exist people with underlying conditions which blur or remove the line between the two, however, those are a minority, and judging a majority of people based on the flaws of any minority is unfair. This also doesn't change on a dime simply because it's sexual attraction towards pixels and drawings instead of bloodlust and murder in video games; the brain functions the same way it always does.
- The effects of fiction on reality is not a "monkey see, monkey do" mechanic. Kids don't jump off cliffs to fly like Superman. Its effects on reality is something you learn in English class, but I seriously doubt any Anti could've passed a class meant to test critical thinking skills without cheating, paying off the teachers, or fucking them.
As you read through this thread, it's clear that this person thinks people can be minor-coded, and that attraction to those people is pedophilia.
That, and the last quote is rather proof and indication that this person is not as human as we know humans to be.
@GoromiBitch: "I don't care about it being morally wrong or not, I'm disgusted, and the fact you guys aren't makes you less than me"
That's what he essentially says.
So, I don't plan to give him any respect as a human being.
Tweet ||
Personally, I believe that everyone has the capacity to be moral, just, and good.
However, I've met many Antis before, and whether it's due to stubbornness, fear of group rejection/retaliation, brainwash, or whatever, it doesn't change the fact that they're needlessly cruel.
And honestly, I'm unable to see anyone who affiliates themselves as one as human.
They threw away their humanity.
I'm simply unable to find it again and give them it back.
Update: (2021-07-06)
Tweet || Archive
Well, he's still going on about how he's disgusted at the notion that lolicons like depictions of children and thus pedophilia under his eyes, which, no matter where this goes now, it doesn't really change how stupid he is.
By the way, what I tried to say was "From an angry person to the point of disgust" in Latin.
Which was rather quick to trigger him in seconds
Tweet || Archive
He's fine with getting fucked by dogs but drawings are a no-no.
My explanations are in my reply tweets.
Threads I've Done:
Awesome Groomer Facts** || Fought Nazis** || Fought Racists** || Daily Bullshit 2
Daily Bullshit 3 || Daily Bullshit 4* || Cartoon Chris Hansen || Daily Bullshit 5
Daily Bullshit 6 || Daily Bullshit 7** || Daily Bullshit 8 || Daily Bullshit 9
Daily Bullshit 10** || Daily Bullshit 10.5** || Daily Bullshit 11 || Daily Bullshit 12
(You are here) ||
*Anti-Argument Categories; I did a little categorization of arguments and tactics Antis like to use when arguing against lolicon media in that thread, but those arguments also slightly applies to other forms of media Antis consider "problematic," so I marked it with an asterisk just in case people find it useful or important.
**Mainly Archival/Lack of Explanations; Daily Bullshit started mainly to show the daily bullshit lolicons and in general anyone who likes "problematic media" have to deal with by showing examples of harassment. The explanations I added about basic ethical theories, psychological observations, and legal information to explain why they're obviously wrong ended up being my gimmick in these threads, and aren't actually supposed to be the usual. But fate had it such that this is what I do now. Yay.
Last edited: