These tweets are in the same thread as the supposed sexually explicit image, so again, no archive, as it would also capture that image as well.
Apparently the culprit is Dicey, who is a lolicon.
Another person decided to call them out and ask for a testimony.
And apparently, they went to the same school together and had a little gay relationship.
What was captured out of context was basically
boyfriends flirting together.
Said relationship was
just 3 years apart. Basically, Junior dating Freshman, Senior dating Sophomore.
That relationship isn't uncommon, and unless you plan to call all high school relationships inherently pedophilic,
any rational and reasonable mind can tell this isn't an issue.
You can debate whether it's alright/smart or not to flirt like that online, or openly have that relationship, or literally anything about it if you want, because
it's irrelevant to the fact this was basically a false and slanderous statement towards Dicey and Lolicons as a whole.
Was it reasonable to assume that? Was it wrong to assume what he had?
Is that relevant? For what he claims to be "sexually explicit selfies" from a 15 year old, this fucker apparently had
no problem redistributing apparent CSEM with his audience.
No one claimed it was okay for minors to be posting sexual selfies online. Oh hey, Scarecrow from Wizard of Oz, whatcha doing next to us? You're one dapper Strawman, ngl.
Quite literally, no one in the replies ever justified or argued that. The only thing being argued were "3 year gap relationships from high school aren't immoral" and "
And rather irrelevant to the topic.
The problem is spreading false information, damaging narratives, and
slandering someone innocent as a criminal.
But of course, he is unable to see this as anything as "kid being groomed by adult," or at minimum demonstrate such mental ability to be capable of considering other scenarioes.
Given most Antis, it's safe to assume he isn't sapient.
I hope to fuck that selfie isn't actually sexually explicit and it isn't CSEM this moron decided to share, and that this dude's just an idiot overreacting to shit.
But anyway, I'm not going to justify Dicey or anything he did, nor the minor who took the selfie, nor the others who allegedly 'fawned' over it.
Simply put,
Dicey's relationship is NOT pedophilic.
Next,
that kid should NOT be sending explicit selfies over the surface web.
As for the others, well. See next section.